ArticleWorld journal of surgery2015
Patterns of Use and Short-Term Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Malignant Pheochromocytoma: A Population-Level Study.
Article in World journal of surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Progress in surgical approaches and outcomes of patients with pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma.Best practice & research. Clinical endocrinology & metabolism · 2025Review
- Article
- Robotic adrenalectomy in patients with pheochromocytoma: a systematic review.Gland surgery · 2020Review
- [Genetics of pheochromocytoma and the relevance in surgery].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2019Review
- Risk factors for 30-day readmission after adrenalectomy.Surgery · 2018Article
- Patterns of Use and Short-Term Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Malignant Pheochromocytoma: A Population-Level Study.World journal of surgery · 2016Article
- Patterns of Use and Short-Term Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Malignant Pheochromocytoma: A Population-Level Study: Reply.World journal of surgery · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMalignant pheochromocytoma is rare, and there is a scarcity of data on the use of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for treatment. The aims of this study were to analyze patterns of use of MIS for malignant pheochromocytoma in the U.S. and compare short-term outcomes to those of open adrenalectomy.
methodsPatients with malignant pheochromocytoma undergoing MIS, including laparoscopy, robotic assisted, laparoscopy converted to open, or open adrenalectomy, were culled from the National Cancer Database, from 1998 to 2011. Data were examined using simple summary statistics, Χ2 and student's t tests, Mann-Whitney test, and logistic regression.
resultsA total of 36 MIS and 67 open adrenalectomies were identified in 2010-2011. No significant differences were observed between the two treatment groups in demographic characteristics or comorbidities. Preoperative diagnosis of malignancy was made in 52.8% of MIS and 48.5% of open patients (p=NS). MIS and open adrenalectomies did not differ with respect to lymph node metastases, vascular invasion, extra-adrenal-extension, and distant metastases (all p=NS). MIS tended to more often be used to perform partial adrenalectomy (38.9 vs. 20.4% open, p=0.061); surgical margins, 30-day readmission and mortality rates were similar to open adrenalectomy (all p=NS). Tumors removed via MIS were smaller (48.7 vs. 73.3 mm open, p=0.003) and associated with a shorter length of stay.
conclusionsA significant proportion of patients with malignant pheochromocytomas underwent MIS, with short-term outcomes which are comparable to those of open surgery. Further studies focused on long-term survival and recurrence are needed to assess the role of MIS in the management of these rare tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.