Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25821529›Full record

ArticleJournal of population ageing2015

Awareness of Memory Ability and Change: (In)Accuracy of Memory Self-Assessments in Relation to Performance.

Elizabeth Hahn Rickenbach, Stefan Agrigoroaei, Margie E Lachman

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of population ageing, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Subjective cognitive decline,Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Does the association between objective and subjective memory vary by age among healthy older adults?Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Elizabeth Hahn RickenbachDepartment of Psychology, Saint Anselm College, Manchester, NH.
Stefan AgrigoroaeiPsychological Sciences Research Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, Belgium.
Margie E LachmanDepartment of Psychology, Brandeis University.
Brandeis University · USSaint Anselm College · USUCLouvain · BE

Funding

STATISTICS COREP01AG020166 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI RYFF, CAROL D. · 2002 to 2015
$50.6M
Statistical Data EnclaveP30AG012846 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Esther M. Friedman · 1999 to 2026
$23.2M
CONTROL BELIEFS, MEMORY, AND AGINGR01AG017920 · NIA · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI LACHMAN, MARGIE E · 2000 to 2012
$2.6M
NIA NIH HHS P01 AG020166NIA NIH HHS P30 AG012846NIA NIH HHS R01 AG017920
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Little is known about subjective assessments of memory abilities and decline among middle-aged adults or their association with objective memory performance in the general population. In this study we examined self-ratings of memory ability and change in relation to episodic memory performance in two national samples of middle-aged and older adults from the Midlife in the United States study (MIDUS II in 2005-06) and the Health and Retirement Study (HRS; every two years from 2002 to 2012). MIDUS (Study 1) participants (N=3,581) rated their memory compared to others their age and to themselves five years ago; HRS (Study 2) participants (N=14,821) rated their current memory and their memory compared to two years ago, with up to six occasions of longitudinal data over ten years. In both studies, episodic memory performance was the total number of words recalled in immediate and delayed conditions. When controlling for demographic and health correlates, self-ratings of memory abilities, but not subjective change, were related to performance. We examined accuracy by comparing subjective and objective memory ability and change. More than one third of the participants across the studies had self-assessments that were inaccurate relative to their actual level of performance and change, and accuracy differed as a function of demographic and health factors. Further understanding of self-awareness of memory abilities and change beginning in midlife may be useful for identifying early warning signs of decline, with implications regarding policies and practice for early detection and treatment of cognitive impairment.

Indexed as

Accuracy of self-assessmentsEpisodic memoryMemory complaintsMemory concernsMemory self-ratingsSubjective Memory AbilitySubjective Memory Change

Identifiers

PMID25821529
PMCPMC4371608
OpenAlexW2077352373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.