Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25821200›Full record

ReviewStem cells (Dayton, Ohio)2015

Concise Review: NANOG in Cancer Stem Cells and Tumor Development: An Update and Outstanding Questions.

Collene R Jeter, Tao Yang, Junchen Wang, Hsueh-Ping Chao, Dean G Tang

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 126 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
126citing papers in PubMed
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

126 citing papers in PubMed, 237 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Expression of ALDH1A1 & Nanog in squamous cell carcinoma of cervix.The Indian journal of medical research · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

66 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Collene R JeterDepartment of Epigenetics and Molecular Carcinogenesis, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Science Park, Smithville, Texas, USA.
Tao YangCancer Stem Cell Institute, Research Center for Translational Medicine, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Junchen WangCancer Stem Cell Institute, Research Center for Translational Medicine, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Hsueh-Ping ChaoDepartment of Epigenetics and Molecular Carcinogenesis, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Science Park, Smithville, Texas, USA.
Dean G TangDepartment of Epigenetics and Molecular Carcinogenesis, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Science Park, Smithville, Texas, USA.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USShanghai East Hospital · CN

Funding

Decoding NanogP8 in TumorigenesisR01CA155693 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI TANG, DEAN G. · 2012 to 2016
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS NIH R01-CA155693NCI NIH HHS R01 CA155693
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The homeobox domain transcription factor NANOG, a key regulator of embryonic development and cellular reprogramming, has been reported to be broadly expressed in human cancers. Functional studies have provided strong evidence that NANOG possesses protumorigenic attributes. In addition to promoting self-renewal and long-term proliferative potential of stem-like cancer cells, NANOG-mediated oncogenic reprogramming may underlie clinical manifestations of malignant disease. In this review, we examine the molecular origin, expression, biological activities, and mechanisms of action of NANOG in various malignancies. We also consider clinical implications such as correlations between NANOG expression and cancer prognosis and/or response to therapy. We surmise that NANOG potentiates the molecular circuitry of tumorigenesis, and thus may represent a novel therapeutic target or biomarker for the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment outcome of cancer. Finally, we present critical pending questions relating NANOG to cancer stem cells and tumor development.

Indexed as

Cell Transformation, NeoplasticCellular ReprogrammingAnimalsHomeodomain ProteinsHumansNanog Homeobox ProteinNeoplasm ProteinsNeoplasmsNeoplastic Stem CellsHomeodomain ProteinsNanog Homeobox ProteinNANOG protein, humanNeoplasm ProteinsCancer stem cellsNANOGSelf-renewalTumor development

Identifiers

PMID25821200
PMCPMC4509798
OpenAlexW1904221680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.