Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25821196›Full record

ReviewTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2015

Sequencing consolidates molecular markers with plant breeding practice.

Huaan Yang, Chengdao Li, Hon-Ming Lam, Jonathan Clements, Guijun Yan, Shancen Zhao

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Functional Markers for Precision Plant Breeding.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Fine mapping and gene cloning in the post-NGS era: advances and prospects.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Huaan YangDepartment of Agriculture and Food Western Australia, 3 Baron-Hay Court, South Perth, 6151, Australia, huaan.yang@agric.wa.gov.au.
Chengdao Li
Hon-Ming Lam
Jonathan Clements
Guijun Yan
Shancen Zhao

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key messagePlenty of molecular markers have been developed by contemporary sequencing technologies, whereas few of them are successfully applied in breeding, thus we present a review on how sequencing can facilitate marker-assisted selection in plant breeding. The growing global population and shrinking arable land area require efficient plant breeding. Novel strategies assisted by certain markers have proven effective for genetic gains. Fortunately, cutting-edge sequencing technologies bring us a deluge of genomes and genetic variations, enlightening the potential of marker development. However, a large gap still exists between the potential of molecular markers and actual plant breeding practices. In this review, we discuss marker-assisted breeding from a historical perspective, describe the road from crop sequencing to breeding, and highlight how sequencing facilitates the application of markers in breeding practice.

Indexed as

BreedingGenetic MarkersCrops, AgriculturalDNA, PlantGenotyping TechniquesQuantitative Trait LociSequence Analysis, DNADNA, PlantGenetic Markers

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.