Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25821191›Full record

ArticleCurrent infectious disease reports2015

Pressure ulcers in the ICU patient: an update on prevention and treatment.

Anna E Krupp, Jill Monfre

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current infectious disease reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05564975 (Construction and Application of Pressure Injury Risk Prediction Model for Critically Ill Patients Based on Machine Learning Algorithm), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05564975 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Construction and Application of Pressure Injury Risk Prediction Model for Critically Ill Patients Based on Machine Learning Algorithm

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorYang ChaonanRan2022 to 2022Enrolled350ConditionsPressure Injury, Critically Ill Patients, Risk Factors, Machine Learning Algorithms
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A systematic review of clinical practice guidelines and other best practice recommendations for pressure injury risk assessment in the United States.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Examining Prevalence and Risk Factors of Incontinence-Associated Dermatitis Using the International Pressure Ulcer Prevalence Survey.Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anna E KruppDepartment of Nursing and Patient Care Services, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, 600 Highland Ave., C7/305, Madison, WI, 53792, USA, akrupp@uwhealth.org.
Jill Monfre
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USUW Health University Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The occurrence of hospital-acquired pressure ulcers (HAPU) is a recognized metric of quality of care by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Pressure ulcer (PU) prevention and treatment have become a priority for many facilities as the reimbursement for hospital-acquired PUs has been significantly restricted by regulations implemented by CMS in 2008. Intensive care unit (ICU) patients are at higher risk for PU development due to comorbidities and life-saving treatment modalities in this environment. PU occurrence in ICUs ranges from 8.8 to 23 %. The literature was reviewed for recent advances in PU prevention and treatment in ICU patients. Advancements include risk assessment, education, turning schedules, providing staff with feedback from audits, lift teams, review of linen, consensus statement regarding unavoidable PU, treatment modalities, and an assessment of the knowledge providers have of PU prevention and treatment.

Identifiers

PMID25821191
OpenAlexW1968213967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.