Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25820261›Full record

ReviewThe EMBO journal2015

Reprogramming of cell fate: epigenetic memory and the erasure of memories past.

Buhe Nashun, Peter W S Hill, Petra Hajkova

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The EMBO journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 105 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
105citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

105 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pluripotent stem cells: induction and self-renewal.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Epigenetic regulation of kidney development.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2026
    Review
  3. Epigenetic Mechanisms of Vitamin D in the Aging Process: A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Deciphering precursor cell dynamics in esophageal preneoplasia via genetic barcoding and single-cell transcriptomics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Human brain organoids for understanding substance use disorders.Drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2025
    Review
  18. The Mammalian Oocyte: A Central Hub for Cellular Reprogramming and Stemness.Stem cells and cloning : advances and applications · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

45 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Buhe NashunMedical Research Council Clinical Sciences Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Peter W S HillMedical Research Council Clinical Sciences Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Petra HajkovaMedical Research Council Clinical Sciences Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK petra.hajkova@csc.mrc.ac.uk.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U120092689Medical Research Council MC_US_A652_5PY70
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell identity is a reflection of a cell type-specific gene expression profile, and consequently, cell type-specific transcription factor networks are considered to be at the heart of a given cellular phenotype. Although generally stable, cell identity can be reprogrammed in vitro by forced changes to the transcriptional network, the most dramatic example of which was shown by the induction of pluripotency in somatic cells by the ectopic expression of defined transcription factors alone. Although changes to cell fate can be achieved in this way, the efficiency of such conversion remains very low, in large part due to specific chromatin signatures constituting an epigenetic barrier to the transcription factor-mediated reprogramming processes. Here we discuss the two-way relationship between transcription factor binding and chromatin structure during cell fate reprogramming. We additionally explore the potential roles and mechanisms by which histone variants, chromatin remodelling enzymes, and histone and DNA modifications contribute to the stability of cell identity and/or provide a permissive environment for cell fate change during cellular reprogramming.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationChromatinEpigenesis, GeneticHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsTranscription FactorsChromatinTranscription Factorscell fatechromatininduced pluripotent stem cellsreprogrammingtranscription factors

Identifiers

PMID25820261
PMCPMC4491992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.