Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25819965›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2015

Comparison of the Prevalences and Diversities of Listeria Species and Listeria monocytogenes in an Urban and a Rural Agricultural Watershed.

Emma C Stea, Laura M Purdue, Rob C Jamieson, Chris K Yost, Lisbeth Truelstrup Hansen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026
    Review
  4. One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025
    Review
  5. A Quantitative Risk Assessment Model forFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Human Listeriosis.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Microorganisms · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Saprophytic Lifestyle ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Emma C SteaDepartment of Process Engineering and Applied Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Laura M PurdueDepartment of Process Engineering and Applied Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Rob C JamiesonDepartment of Process Engineering and Applied Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Chris K YostDepartment of Biology, University of Regina, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Lisbeth Truelstrup HansenDepartment of Process Engineering and Applied Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada ltruelst@dal.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0485-5252

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Foods and related processing environments are commonly contaminated with the pathogenic Listeria monocytogenes. To investigate potential environmental reservoirs of Listeria spp. and L. monocytogenes, surface water and point source pollution samples from an urban and a rural municipal water supply watershed in Nova Scotia, Canada, were examined over 18 months. Presumptive Listeria spp. were cultured from 72 and 35% of rural and urban water samples, respectively, with 24% of the positive samples containing two or three different Listeria spp. The L. innocua (56%) and L. welshimeri (43%) groups were predominant in the rural and urban watersheds, respectively. Analysis by the TaqMan assay showed a significantly (P < 0.05) higher prevalence of L. monocytogenes of 62% versus 17% by the culture-based method. Both methods revealed higher prevalences in the rural watershed and during the fall and winter seasons. Elevated Escherichia coli (≥ 100 CFU/100 ml) levels were not associated with the pathogen regardless of the detection method. Isolation of Listeria spp. were associated with 70 times higher odds of isolating L. monocytogenes (odds ratio = 70; P < 0.001). Serogroup IIa was predominant (67.7%) among the 285 L. monocytogenes isolates, followed by IVb (16.1%), IIb (15.8%), and IIc (0.4%). L. monocytogenes was detected in cow feces and raw sewage but not in septic tank samples. Pulsotyping of representative water (n = 54) and local human (n = 19) isolates suggested genetic similarities among some environmental and human L. monocytogenes isolates. In conclusion, temperate surface waters contain a diverse Listeria species population and could be a potential reservoir for L. monocytogenes, especially in rural agricultural watersheds.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationWater MicrobiologyAnimalsHumansListeriaNova ScotiaPrevalenceRural PopulationSeasonsUrban Population

Identifiers

PMID25819965
PMCPMC4421070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.