Trial reportEuropean urology2015
Precision Medicine in Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: Development of the Canary-Early Detection Research Network Active Surveillance Biopsy Risk Calculator.
Trial report in European urology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating the Four Kallikrein Panel of the 4Kscore for Prediction of High-grade Prostate Cancer in Men in the Canary Prostate Active Surveillance Study.European urology · 2017Trial
- Predictive models for biopsy upgrading in active surveillance for prostate cancer: a scoping review.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Prognostic value of MR visibility/invisibility in men on Active Surveillance.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2025Article
- Risk of progression following a negative biopsy in prostate cancer active surveillance.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2023Article
- Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: Past, Current, and Future Trends.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Review
- Impact of Prostate Health Index Results for Prediction of Biopsy Grade Reclassification During Active Surveillance.The Journal of urology · 2022Article
- Active surveillance for prostate cancer: selection criteria, guidelines, and outcomes.World journal of urology · 2022Review
- Epigenetic loss of heterogeneity from low to high grade localized prostate tumours.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Use of the MyProstateScore Test to Rule Out Clinically Significant Cancer: Validation of a Straightforward Clinical Testing Approach.The Journal of urology · 2021Article
- Personalised biopsy schedules based on risk of Gleason upgrading for patients with low-risk prostate cancer on active surveillance.BJU international · 2021Article
- Observational
- Cost implications of PSA screening differ by age.BMC urology · 2018Article
- Role of Surveillance Biopsy with No Cancer as a Prognostic Marker for Reclassification: Results from the Canary Prostate Active Surveillance Study.European urology · 2018Article
- Biomarkers in active surveillance.Translational andrology and urology · 2018Review
- Active surveillance: a review of risk-based, dynamic monitoring.Translational andrology and urology · 2018Review
- Informational needs during active surveillance for prostate cancer: A qualitative study.Patient education and counseling · 2018Article
- Comparative Analysis of Biopsy Upgrading in Four Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance Cohorts.Annals of internal medicine · 2018Article
- Article
- Further reduction of disqualification rates by additional MRI-targeted biopsy with transperineal saturation biopsy compared with standard 12-core systematic biopsies for the selection of prostate cancer patients for active surveillance.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2016Article
- Active surveillance for prostate cancer: current evidence and contemporary state of practice.Nature reviews. Urology · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMen on active surveillance (AS) face repeated biopsies. Most biopsy specimens will not show disease progression or change management. Such biopsies do not contribute to patient management and are potentially morbid and costly.
objectiveTo use a contemporary AS prospective trial to develop a tool to predict AS biopsy outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsBiopsy samples (median: 2; range: 2-9 per patient) from 859 men participating in the Canary Prostate Active Surveillance Study and with Gleason 6 prostate cancer (median follow-up: 35.8 mo; range: 3.0-148.7 mo) were analyzed. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Logistic regression was used to predict progression, defined as an increase in Gleason score from ≤6 to ≥7 or increase in percentage of cores positive for cancer from <34% to ≥34%. Fivefold internal cross-validation was performed to evaluate the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Statistically significant risk factors for progression on biopsy were prostate-specific antigen (odds ratio [OR]: 1.045; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.028-1.063), percentage of cores positive for cancer on most recent biopsy (OR: 1.401; 95% CI, 1.301-1.508), and history of at least one prior negative biopsy (OR: 0.524; 95% CI, 0.417-0.659). A multivariable predictive model incorporating these factors plus age and number of months since last biopsy achieved an AUC of 72.4%.
conclusionsA combination of readily available clinical measures can stratify patients considering AS prostate biopsy. Risk of progression or upgrade can be estimated and incorporated into clinical practice. PATIENT SUMMARY: The Canary-Early Detection Research Network Active Surveillance Biopsy Risk Calculator, an online tool, can be used to guide patient decision making regarding follow-up prostate biopsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.