Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25819462›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2015

Treatment of spontaneous preterm labour with retosiban: a phase 2 proof-of-concept study.

Steven Thornton, Hugh Miller, Guillermo Valenzuela, Jerry Snidow, Brendt Stier, Michael J Fossler, Timothy H Montague, Marcy Powell, Kathleen J Beach

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT00404768 (A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Dose Ranging Study to Investigate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of GSK221149A Administered Intravenously and to Investigate the Pharmacokinetics of GSK221149A Administered Orally to Healthy, Pregnant Females With Uncomplicated Pre-term Labor Between 300/7 and 356/7 Weeks' Gestation), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00404768 phase2completednot on this map

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Dose Ranging Study to Investigate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of GSK221149A Administered Intravenously and to Investigate the Pharmacokinetics of GSK221149A Administered Orally to Healthy, Pregnant Females With Uncomplicated Pre-term Labor Between 300/7 and 356/7 Weeks' Gestation

TypeinterventionalSponsorGlaxoSmithKlineRan2007 to 2011Enrolled93ConditionsObstetric Labour, PrematureArmsGSK221149A, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Tocolytics for delaying preterm birth: a network meta-analysis (0924).The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Corrigendum.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Steven ThorntonUniversity of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.
Hugh MillerWatching Over Mothers and Babies Foundation, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Guillermo ValenzuelaArrowhead Regional Medical Center, Colton, CA, USA.
Jerry SnidowGlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Brendt StierGlaxoSmithKline, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Michael J FosslerGlaxoSmithKline, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Timothy H MontagueGlaxoSmithKline, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Marcy PowellGlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Kathleen J BeachGlaxoSmithKline, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
GlaxoSmithKline (United States) · USArrowhead Regional Medical Center · USResearch Triangle Park Foundation · USUniversity of Exeter · GBWatching Over Mothers & Babies · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe aim was to investigate the efficacy and safety of intravenous retosiban in women with spontaneous preterm labour.

methodsThis was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. Retosiban was administered intravenously for 48 h to women in spontaneous preterm labour between 30(0/7) and 35(6/7)  weeks' gestation with an uncomplicated singleton pregnancy in an in-patient obstetric unit. Outcome measures were uterine quiescence (primary endpoint), days to delivery, preterm delivery and safety.

resultsUterine quiescence was achieved in 62% of women who received retosiban (n = 30) compared with 41% who received placebo (n = 34). The relative risk (RR) was 1.53 (95% credible interval [CrI] 0.98, 2.48; NS). Retosiban resulted in a significant increase in time to delivery compared with placebo (mean difference 8.2 days, 95% CrI 2.7, 13.74). This difference was consistent across all gestational ages. The proportion of preterm births in the retosiban and placebo groups was 18.7% (95% CrI 7.4%, 33.7%) and 47.2% (95% CrI 31.4%, 63.4%), respectively. The RR of preterm birth in women treated with retosiban was 0.38 (95% CrI 0.15, 0.81). There were no deliveries within 7 days in the retosiban group, but there were six (17.6%) births in the placebo group. The maternal, fetal and neonatal adverse events were comparable in the retosiban and placebo groups.

conclusionsIntravenous administration of retosiban in women with spontaneous preterm labour was associated with a greater than 1 week increase in time to delivery compared with placebo, a significant reduction in preterm deliveries, a non-significant increase in uterine quiescence and a favourable safety profile.

Indexed as

Administration, IntravenousAdultDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMiddle AgedObstetric Labor, PrematurePiperazinesPregnancyPremature BirthReceptors, OxytocinTime FactorsUterine ContractionYoung AdultGSK221149AOXTR protein, humanPiperazinesReceptors, Oxytocinpreterm birthpreterm labourproof-of-concept studyretosibanuterine quiescence

Identifiers

PMID25819462
PMCPMC4594710
OpenAlexW1480177808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.