Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25818893›Full record

ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2015

Colorectal cancer drug target prediction using ontology-based inference and network analysis.

Cui Tao, Jingchun Sun, W Jim Zheng, Junjie Chen, Hua Xu

Open access · goldAbstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Semantic Web Ontology and Data Integration: a Case Study in Aiding Psychiatric Drug Repurposing.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cui TaoCenter for Computational Biomedicine, School of Biomedical informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, USA and Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Jingchun SunCenter for Computational Biomedicine, School of Biomedical informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, USA and Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
W Jim ZhengCenter for Computational Biomedicine, School of Biomedical informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, USA and Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Junjie ChenCenter for Computational Biomedicine, School of Biomedical informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, USA and Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Hua XuCenter for Computational Biomedicine, School of Biomedical informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, USA and Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA hua.xu@uth.tmc.edu.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Patient Medical History Representation, Extraction, and Inference from EHR DataR01LM011829 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI TAO, CUI · 2014 to 2018
$1.7M
Bridging Genomics and Medicine by Ontology FingerprintsR56LM010680 · NLM · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI LAWSON, ANDREW B. · 2012 to 2013
$499k
NLM NIH HHS R01 LM011829NLM NIH HHS R01LM011829NLM NIH HHS R56 LM010680
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identification of novel drug targets is a critical step in drug development. Many recent studies have produced multiple types of data, which provides an opportunity to mine the relationships among them to predict drug targets. In this study, we present a novel integrative approach that combines ontology reasoning with network-assisted gene ranking to predict new drug targets. We utilized colorectal cancer (CRC) as a proof-of-concept use case to illustrate the approach. Starting from FDA-approved CRC drugs and the relationships among disease, drug, gene, pathway, and SNP in an ontology representing PharmGKB data, we inferred 113 potential CRC drug targets. We further prioritized these genes based on their relationships with CRC disease genes in the context of human protein-protein interaction networks. Thus, among the 113 potential drug targets, 15 were selected as the promising drug targets, including some genes that are supported by previous studies. Among them, EGFR, TOP1 and VEGFA are known targets of FDA-approved drugs. Additionally, CCND1 (cyclin D1), and PTGS2 (prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2) have reported to be relevant to CRC or as potential drug targets based on the literature search. These results indicate that our approach is promising for drug target prediction for CRC treatment, which might be useful for other cancer therapeutics.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualDrug Delivery SystemsDrug DesignNeoplasm ProteinsAntineoplastic AgentsColorectal NeoplasmsHumansAntineoplastic AgentsNeoplasm Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25818893
PMCPMC4375358
OpenAlexW2157734084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.