Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25818618›Full record

ArticleEcology letters2015

Unifying ecology and macroevolution with individual-based theory.

James Rosindell, Luke J Harmon, Rampal S Etienne

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology letters, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Reading Yule in light of the history and present of macroevolution.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The development of Anthropocene biotas.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Clownfishes evolution below and above the species level.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2018
    Article
  13. Understanding how biodiversity unfolds through time under neutral theory.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Article
  14. Microscale Insight into Microbial Seed Banks.Frontiers in microbiology · 2016
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

James RosindellDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park campus, Buckhurst Road, Ascot, SL5 7PY, UK.
Luke J Harmon
Rampal S Etienne

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A contemporary goal in both ecology and evolutionary biology is to develop theory that transcends the boundary between the two disciplines, to understand phenomena that cannot be explained by either field in isolation. This is challenging because macroevolution typically uses lineage-based models, whereas ecology often focuses on individual organisms. Here, we develop a new parsimonious individual-based theory by adding mild selection to the neutral theory of biodiversity. We show that this model generates realistic phylogenies showing a slowdown in diversification and also improves on the ecological predictions of neutral theory by explaining the occurrence of very common species. Moreover, we find the distribution of individual fitness changes over time, with average fitness increasing at a pace that depends positively on community size. Consequently, large communities tend to produce fitter species than smaller communities. These findings have broad implications beyond biodiversity theory, potentially impacting, for example, invasion biology and paleontology.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionModels, BiologicalEcologyGenetic FitnessPhylogenyPopulation DensityPopulation DynamicsEcologyfitnessindividual-based modellineages-through-timemacroevolutionneutralphylogenyselectionspecies abundancetheory

Identifiers

PMID25818618
PMCPMC4403962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.