Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25818052›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience2015

Osteoarthritis-dependent changes in antinociceptive action of Nav1.7 and Nav1.8 sodium channel blockers: An in vivo electrophysiological study in the rat.

W Rahman, A H Dickenson

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Ion channels as therapeutic targets in osteoarthritis.Trends in pharmacological sciences · 2025
    Review
  7. Inhibiting Nav1.8 for pain: Lessons from patients and from neurons.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Uncoupling the CRMP2-CaThe journal of pain · 2024
    Article
  12. [Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Uncoupling the CRMP2-CabioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  15. NaNature · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

W RahmanDepartment of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK. Electronic address: w.rahman@ucl.ac.uk.
A H DickensonDepartment of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
University College London · GB

Funding

Arthritis Research UK 19444Versus Arthritis 19444
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Voltage-gated sodium channel blockers are not traditionally recommended for osteoarthritis (OA) pain therapy, but given the large peripheral drive that follows OA development there is a rationale for their use. Using a rat model of monosodium iodoacetate (MIA)-induced OA we used in vivo electrophysiology to assess the effects of the Nav1.7- and Nav1.8-selective antagonists, ProTxII and A-803467 respectively, on the evoked activity of spinal dorsal horn neurons in response to electrical, mechanical and thermal stimuli applied to the peripheral receptive field. These studies allow examination of the roles of these channels in suprathreshold stimuli, not amenable to behavioral threshold measures. Spinal administration of ProTxII significantly reduced neuronal responses evoked by mechanical punctate (von Frey (vF) 8-60g) and noxious thermal (45 and 48°C) stimuli in MIA rats only. A-803467 significantly inhibited neuronal responses evoked by vF 8-60g and 48°C heat after spinal administration; significantly inhibited responses evoked by brush, vFs 26-60g and 40-48°C stimuli after systemic administration; significantly inhibited the electrically evoked Aδ-, C-fiber, post-discharge, Input and wind-up responses and the brush, vFs 8-60g and 45-48°C evoked neuronal responses after intra plantar injection in the MIA group. In comparison A-803467 effects in the sham group were minimal and included a reduction of the neuronal response evoked by vF 60g and 45°C heat stimulation after spinal administration, no effect after systemic administration and an inhibition of the evoked response to 45°C heat after intra plantar injection only. The observed selective inhibitory effect of ProTxII and A-803467 for the MIA-treated group suggests an increased role of Nav1.7 and 1.8 within nociceptive pathways in the arthritic condition, located at peripheral and central sites. These findings demonstrate the importance of, and add to, the mechanistic understanding of these channels in osteoarthritic pain.

Indexed as

AnalgesicsAnalysis of VarianceAniline CompoundsAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalDose-Response Relationship, DrugEvoked PotentialsFunctional LateralityFuransHyperalgesiaLaminectomyNAV1.7 Voltage-Gated Sodium ChannelNAV1.8 Voltage-Gated Sodium ChannelOsteoarthritisPain MeasurementRatsA 803467AnalgesicsAniline CompoundsFuransNAV1.7 Voltage-Gated Sodium ChannelNAV1.8 Voltage-Gated Sodium ChannelScn10a protein, ratScn9a protein, ratSodium Channel Blockersdorsal hornelectrophysiologyosteoarthritispainsodium channels

Identifiers

PMID25818052
PMCPMC4414363
OpenAlexW1994504221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.