ArticleJournal of food science2015
Feasibility of including green tea products for an analytically verified dietary supplement database.
Article in Journal of food science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analytical Challenges and Metrological Approaches to Ensuring Dietary Supplement Quality: International Perspectives.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Review
- Current regulatory guidelines and resources to support research of dietary supplements in the United States.Critical reviews in food science and nutrition · 2020Review
- The Dietary Supplement Label Database: Recent Developments and Applications.The Journal of nutrition · 2018Article
- Challenges in Developing Analytically Validated Laboratory-Derived Dietary Supplement Databases.The Journal of nutrition · 2018Article
- Characteristics and Challenges of Dietary Supplement Databases Derived from Label Information.The Journal of nutrition · 2018Article
- Dietary Supplement Ingredient Database (DSID) and the Application of Analytically Based Estimates of Ingredient Amount to Intake Calculations.The Journal of nutrition · 2018Article
- Review
- Is Nutrient Content and Other Label Information for Prescription Prenatal Supplements Different from Nonprescription Products?Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics · 2017Article
- Comparison of Metabolomics Approaches for Evaluating the Variability of Complex Botanical Preparations: Green Tea (Camellia sinensis) as a Case Study.Journal of natural products · 2017Article
- Culinary Spice Plants in Dietary Supplement Products and Tested in Clinical Trials.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Dietary Supplement Ingredient Database (DSID) is a federally funded, publicly accessible dietary supplement database that currently contains analytically derived information on micronutrients in selected adult and children's multivitamin and mineral (MVM) supplements. Other constituents in dietary supplement products such as botanicals are also of interest and thus are being considered for inclusion in the DSID. Thirty-eight constituents, mainly botanicals were identified and prioritized by a federal interagency committee. Green tea was selected from this list as the botanical for expansion of the DSID. This article describes the process for prioritizing dietary ingredients in the DSID. It also discusses the criteria for inclusion of these ingredients, and the approach for selecting and testing products for the green tea pilot study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.