ArticleAtherosclerosis2015
Iron, inflammation and atherosclerosis risk in men vs. perimenopausal women.
Article in Atherosclerosis, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transferrin predicts trimethylamine-N-oxide levels and is a potential biomarker of cardiovascular disease.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2022Observational
- The influence of inflammation on cardiovascular disease in women.Frontiers in global women's health · 2022Review
- Novel insights into renovascular hypertension and cardio-renal protection by iron restriction.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveAge at first atherosclerotic event is typically older for women vs. men; monthly iron loss has been postulated to contribute to this advantage. We investigated the relationship between an MRI-based arterial wall biomarker and the serum inflammatory biomarker high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) in perimenopausal women vs. men. METHODS AND
resultsWomen without evident atherosclerotic disease were prospectively enrolled and observed over 24 months of menopause transition, indicated by hormone levels and reduction in median number of menstrual cycles from 4 [3-6] per year to 0 [0-1] per year (P < 0.01). Higher hsCRP predicted shorter carotid artery wall T2* in women entering the menopause transition (r = -0.3139, P = 0.0014); this relationship weakened after 24 months of perimenopause in women (r = -0.1718, P = 0.0859) and was not significant in a cohort of men matched for age and cardiovascular risk category (r = -0.0310, P = 0.8362). Serum ferritin increased from baseline to 24-month follow-up during women's menopause transition (37 [20-79] to 67 [36-97] ng/mL, P < 0.01), but still remained lower compared to men (111 [45-220] ng/mL, P < 0.01). Circulating ferritin levels correlated with arterial wall T2* values in women at baseline (r = -0.3163, P = 0.0013) but not in women after 24 months (r = -0.0730, P = 0.4684) of menopause transition nor in men (r = 0.0862, P = 0.5644).
conclusionsAn arterial wall iron-based imaging biomarker reflects degree of systemic inflammation in younger women, whereas this relationship is lost as women transition through menopause to become more similar to men. Iron homeostasis and inflammation in the arterial wall microenvironment warrants further investigation as a potential early target for interventions that mitigate atherosclerosis risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.