Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25816849›Full record

SynthesisMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2015

Epidural analgesia with amide local anesthetics, bupivacaine, and ropivacaine in combination with fentanyl for labor pain relief: a meta-analysis.

Yiyang Li, Cong Hu, Yanyan Fan, Huixia Wang, Hongmei Xu

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Effects of Labor Epidural Analgesia on Short Term Neonatal Morbidity.International journal of women's health · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yiyang LiDepartment of Gynecology, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China (mainland).
Cong HuCenter of Reproductive Medicine, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China (mainland).
Yanyan FanDepartment of Gynecology, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China (mainland).
Huixia WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Jinan General Hospital, PLA Jinan Military Area Command, Jinan, Shandong, China (mainland).
Hongmei XuDepartment of Obstetrics, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China (mainland).
Jilin University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe study compares the effectiveness of bupivacaine and fentanyl (BUPI-FEN) and ropivacaine and fentanyl (ROPI-EFN) in epidural analgesia for labor pain through a meta-analysis of relevant randomized clinical trials. MATERIAL AND

methodsMultiple electronic databases were searched using appropriate MeSH terms and keywords for original English language research papers published between 1990 and March 2014. Meta-analyses results were based on the mean differences between the groups as well as odds ratios where appropriate. Statistical heterogeneity amongst the included studies was tested by I^2 index.

resultsNine studies that met the inclusion criteria were selected for analysis which consisted of 556 parturient patients. The duration of the second stage of labor was significantly shorter in the BUPI-FEN group by a mean of -6.87 (-10.98, -2.77; P<0.002). On the other hand, the ROPI-FEN group had a significantly lower incidence of motor blockade by a mean of 0.31 (0.18, 0.51; P<0.00001). A positive relationship between the amide local anesthetic concentration and the number of women having motor blockade was observed, but a negative relationship between fentanyl concentration and the number of women experiencing a motor block. Moreover, a positive correlation was found between the concentration of ropivacaine and the incidence of instrumental delivery and between the concentration of bupivacaine and the incidence of cesarean delivery.

conclusionsIn combination with fentanyl, bupivacaine and ropivacaine exhibit comparable efficacy and safety. However, BUP-FEN analgesia led to a shortened second-stage labor and ROPI-FEN resulted in a significantly lower incidence of motor block.

Indexed as

Analgesia, EpiduralAdultAmidesAnesthetics, LocalBupivacaineDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleFentanylHumansLabor PainNerve BlockOdds RatioPregnancyPublication BiasRisk FactorsRopivacaineAmidesAnesthetics, LocalBupivacaineFentanylRopivacaine

Identifiers

PMID25816849
PMCPMC4395021
OpenAlexW2042293182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.