Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25816794›Full record

ArticleHuman movement science2015

Visual contribution to human standing balance during support surface tilts.

Lorenz Assländer, Georg Hettich, Thomas Mergner

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human movement science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
14.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Is It Me or the Train Moving? Humans Resolve Sensory Conflicts with a Nonlinear Feedback Mechanism in Balance Control.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Does Regular Dancing Improve Static Balance?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lorenz AssländerNeurological University Clinic, Neurocenter, Breisacher Str. 64, 79106 Freiburg, Germany; Institute for Sport and Sportscience, University of Freiburg, Schwarzwaldstr. 175, 79117 Freiburg, Germany. Electronic address: lorenz.asslaender@sport.uni-freiburg.de.
Georg HettichNeurological University Clinic, Neurocenter, Breisacher Str. 64, 79106 Freiburg, Germany; Institute for Sport and Sportscience, University of Freiburg, Schwarzwaldstr. 175, 79117 Freiburg, Germany.
Thomas MergnerNeurological University Clinic, Neurocenter, Breisacher Str. 64, 79106 Freiburg, Germany.
University of Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual position and velocity cues improve human standing balance, reducing sway responses to external disturbances and sway variability. Previous work suggested that human balancing is based on sensory estimates of external disturbances and their compensation using feedback mechanisms (Disturbance Estimation and Compensation, DEC model). This study investigates the visual effects on sway responses to pseudo-random support surface tilts, assuming that improvements result from lowering the velocity threshold in a tilt estimate and the position threshold in an estimate of the gravity disturbance. Center of mass (COM) sway was measured with four different tilt amplitudes, separating the effect of visual cues across the conditions 'Eyes closed' (no visual cues), '4Hz stroboscopic illumination' (visual position cues), and 'continuous illumination' (visual position and velocity cues). In a model based approach, parameters of disturbance estimators were identified. The model reproduced experimental results and showed a specific reduction of the position and velocity threshold when adding visual position and velocity cues, respectively. Sway variability was analyzed to explore a hypothesized relation between estimator thresholds and internal noise. Results suggest that adding the visual cues reduces the contribution of vestibular noise, thereby reducing sway variability and allowing for lower thresholds, which improves the disturbance compensation.

Indexed as

Postural BalanceAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaComputer SimulationCuesEquipment DesignFeedbackFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMalePhotic StimulationPostureProprioceptionPsychomotor PerformanceVestibule, LabyrinthHuman posture controlModel simulationsNoiseSensory and Motor TestingStroboscopic illuminationVisual cues

Identifiers

PMID25816794
PMCPMC4427279
OpenAlexW2035354640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.