SynthesisPloS one2015
Wound edge protectors in open abdominal surgery to reduce surgical site infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.
- Role of wound protectors in preventing surgical site infection in patients undergoing abdominal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Effect of wound protectors in reducing the incidence of surgical site wound infection in lower gastrointestinal surgery: A meta-analysis.International wound journal · 2023Pooled it
- The clinical effectiveness of wound edge protectors in reducing surgical site infection after abdominal surgery: meta-analysis.BJS open · 2022Pooled it
- The effect of intraoperative wound protector use on the risk of surgical site infections in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2022Pooled it
- Wound protectors in reducing surgical site infections in lower gastrointestinal surgery: an updated meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2018Pooled it
- A systematic review of clinical effectiveness of wound edge protector devices in reducing surgical site infections in patients undergoing abdominal surgery.Updates in surgery · 2017Pooled it
- Infection Risk in Sterile Operative Procedures.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2016Pooled it
- Perioperative Bundle to Reduce Surgical Site Infection after Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Prospective Cohort Study.Journal of the American College of Surgeons · 2019Trial
- Clinical Leadership, Evaluation, and Action Network for surgical site infection control: protocol enhancement in Sudan.IJID regions · 2026Article
- Conversion To Open Approach in Primary Bariatric Surgery: A MBSAQIP Cohort Analysis of 524 224 Patients Evaluating Complications of and Risk Factors for Conversion.Obesity surgery · 2025Article
- Surgical Site Infection After Abdominal Surgery: Distribution and Determinants From a Cross-Sectional Study.Cureus · 2025Article
- Role of single-ring oval disposable wound protecting device in preventing surgical site infection in laparoscopic colorectal resections.Journal of minimal access surgery · 2024Article
- Low-cost wound protector for laparoscopic surgeries.Revista do Colegio Brasileiro de Cirurgioes · 2024Article
- Article
- Advantages of ligating the rectum with gauze pad band in laparoscopic anterior resection of rectal cancer: a propensity score matched analysis.BMC surgery · 2022Article
- Delphi Consensus on Intraoperative Technical/Surgical Aspects to Prevent Surgical Site Infection after Colorectal Surgery.Journal of the American College of Surgeons · 2022Article
- Diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: 2020 update of the WSES Jerusalem guidelines.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2020Review
- Intraoperative surgical site infection control and prevention: a position paper and future addendum to WSES intra-abdominal infections guidelines.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2020Review
- Circular pOlyethylene drape in preVEntion of suRgical site infection (COVER trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.BMJ open · 2020Article
- Surgical site infection following abdominal surgery: a prospective cohort studyCanadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
importanceSurgical site infections remain one of the most frequent complications following abdominal surgery and cause substantial costs, morbidity and mortality.
objectiveTo assess the effectiveness of wound edge protectors in open abdominal surgery in reducing surgical site infections. EVIDENCE REVIEW: A systematic literature search was conducted according to a prespecified review protocol in a variety of data-bases combined with hand-searches for randomized controlled trials on wound edge protectors in patients undergoing laparotomy. A qualitative and quantitative analysis of included trials was conducted.
findingsWe identified 16 randomized controlled trials including 3695 patients investigating wound edge protectors published between 1972 and 2014. Critical appraisal uncovered a number of methodological flaws, predominantly in the older trials. Wound edge protectors significantly reduced the rate of surgical site infections (risk ratio 0.65; 95%CI, 0.51-0.83; p = 0.0007; I2 = 52%). The results were robust in a number of sensitivity analyses. A similar effect size was found in the subgroup of patients undergoing colorectal surgery (risk ratio 0.65; 95%CI, 0.44-0.97; p = 0.04; I2 = 56%). Of the two common types of wound protectors double ring devices were found to exhibit a greater protective effect (risk ratio 0.29; 95%CI, 0.15-0.55) than single-ring devices (risk ratio 0.71; 95%CI, 0.54-0.92), but this might largely be due to the lower quality of available data for double-ring devices. Exploratory subgroup analyses for the degree of contamination showed a larger protective effect in contaminated cases (0.44; 95%CI, 0.28-0.67; p = 0.0002, I2 = 23%) than in clean-contaminated surgeries (0.72, 95%CI, 0.57-0.91; p = 0.005; I2 = 46%) and a strong effect on the reduction of superficial surgical site infections (risk ratio 0.45; 95%CI, 0.24-0.82; p = 0.001; I2 = 72%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Wound edge protectors significantly reduce the rate of surgical site infections in open abdominal surgery. Further trials are needed to explore their effectiveness in different risk constellations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.