ArticlePLoS computational biology2015
Ligand-target prediction by structural network biology using nAnnoLyze.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- De Novo Prediction of Drug Targets and Candidates by Chemical Similarity-Guided Network-Based Inference.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Computational Methods for Drug Repurposing.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022Article
- DeepCPI: A Deep Learning-based Framework for Large-scale in silico Drug Screening.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2019Article
- Predicting protein targets for drug-like compounds using transcriptomics.PLoS computational biology · 2018Article
- Ranking Enzyme Structures in the PDB by Bound Ligand Similarity to Biological Substrates.Structure (London, England : 1993) · 2018Article
- Identifying relationships between unrelated pharmaceutical target proteins on the basis of shared active compounds.Future science OA · 2017Article
- A Multilayer Network Approach for Guiding Drug Repositioning in Neglected Diseases.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2016Article
- Release of 50 new, drug-like compounds and their computational target predictions for open source anti-tubercular drug discovery.PloS one · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Target identification is essential for drug design, drug-drug interaction prediction, dosage adjustment and side effect anticipation. Specifically, the knowledge of structural details is essential for understanding the mode of action of a compound on a target protein. Here, we present nAnnoLyze, a method for target identification that relies on the hypothesis that structurally similar binding sites bind similar ligands. nAnnoLyze integrates structural information into a bipartite network of interactions and similarities to predict structurally detailed compound-protein interactions at proteome scale. The method was benchmarked on a dataset of 6,282 pairs of known interacting ligand-target pairs reaching a 0.96 of area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUC) when using the drug names as an input feature for the classifier, and a 0.70 of AUC for "anonymous" compounds or compounds not present in the training set. nAnnoLyze resulted in higher accuracies than its predecessor, AnnoLyze. We applied the method to predict interactions for all the compounds in the DrugBank database with each human protein structure and provide examples of target identification for known drugs against human diseases. The accuracy and applicability of our method to any compound indicate that a comparative docking approach such as nAnnoLyze enables large-scale annotation and analysis of compound-protein interactions and thus may benefit drug development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.