Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25816249›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2015

Multi-site clinical evaluation of DW-MRI as a treatment response metric for breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Craig J Galbán, Bing Ma, Dariya Malyarenko, Martin D Pickles, Kevin Heist, Norah L Henry, Anne F Schott, Colleen H Neal, Nola M Hylton, Alnawaz Rehemtulla and 5 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02679586 (Evaluation of an Imaging Biomarker for Early Detection of Treatment Efficacy During Breast Cancer Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 43 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02679586 early_phase1completednot on this map

Evaluation of an Imaging Biomarker for Early Detection of Treatment Efficacy During Breast Cancer Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Michigan Rogel Cancer CenterRan2006Enrolled25ConditionsBreast CancerArmsDiffusion weighted MRI
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Applications of TFrontiers in oncology · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Additive value of diffusion-weighted MRI in the I-SPY 2 TRIAL.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2019
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Update on DWI for Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Monitoring.AJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Impact of AlternateTomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Craig J GalbánDepartments of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Bing MaDepartments of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Dariya MalyarenkoDepartments of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Martin D PicklesCentre for MR Investigations, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom.
Kevin HeistDepartments of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Norah L HenryDepartments of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Anne F SchottDepartments of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Colleen H NealDepartments of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Nola M HyltonDepartment of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Alnawaz RehemtullaDepartments of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Timothy D JohnsonDepartments of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Charles R MeyerDepartments of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Thomas L ChenevertDepartments of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Lindsay W TurnbullCentre for MR Investigations, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom.
Brian D RossDepartments of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Michigan United · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USHull York Medical School · GBUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Presurgical Planning with Optimized Verbalized Speech Activation Studies inP01CA087634 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI FESSLER, JEFFREY A · 2002 to 2013
$14.8M
Quantitative DW-MRI for Early Breast Cancer Treatment Response AssessmentU01CA166104 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI CHENEVERT, THOMAS L, GALBAN, CRAIG J · 2012 to 2019
$4.1M
Quantitative Imaging for Assessing Breast Cancer Response to TreatmentU01CA151235 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HYLTON-WATSON, NOLA M. · 2011 to 2015
$2.8M
Cancer Research UKNCI NIH HHS P01 CA087634NCI NIH HHS P01CA087634NCI NIH HHS U01 CA151235NCI NIH HHS U01CA151235NCI NIH HHS U01 CA166104NCI NIH HHS U01CA166104
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate diffusion weighted MRI (DW-MR) as a response metric for assessment of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with primary breast cancer using prospective multi-center trials which provided MR scans along with clinical outcome information. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 39 patients with locally advanced breast cancer accrued from three different prospective clinical trials underwent DW-MR examination prior to and at 3-7 days (Hull University), 8-11 days (University of Michigan) and 35 days (NeoCOMICE) post-treatment initiation. Thirteen patients, 12 of which participated in treatment response study, from UM underwent short interval (<1hr) MRI examinations, referred to as "test-retest" for examination of repeatability. To further evaluate stability in ADC measurements, a thermally controlled diffusion phantom was used to assess repeatability of diffusion measurements. MRI sequences included contrast-enhanced T1-weighted, when appropriate, and DW images acquired at b-values of 0 and 800 s/mm2. Histogram analysis and a voxel-based analytical technique, the Parametric Response Map (PRM), were used to derive diffusion response metrics for assessment of treatment response prediction.

resultsMean tumor apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values generated from patient test-retest examinations were found to be very reproducible (|ΔADC|<0.1x10-3mm2/s). This data was used to calculate the 95% CI from the linear fit of tumor voxel ADC pairs of co-registered examinations (±0.45x10-3mm2/s) for PRM analysis of treatment response. Receiver operating characteristic analysis identified the PRM metric to be predictive of outcome at the 8-11 (AUC = 0.964, p = 0.01) and 35 day (AUC = 0.770, p = 0.05) time points (p<.05) while whole-tumor ADC changes where significant at the later 35 day time interval (AUC = 0.825, p = 0.02).

conclusionThis study demonstrates the feasibility of performing a prospective analysis of DW-MRI as a predictive biomarker of NAC in breast cancer patients. In addition, we provide experimental evidence supporting the use of sensitive analytical tools, such as PRM, for evaluating ADC measurements.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID25816249
PMCPMC4376686
OpenAlexW2077108531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.