Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25816031›Full record

Trial reportMedicine2015

Trunk restraint therapy: the continuous use of the harness could promote feedback dependence in poststroke patients: a randomized trial.

Roberta de Oliveira Cacho, Enio Walker A Cacho, Rodrigo L Ortolan, Alberto Cliquet, Guilherme Borges

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02364141 (Trunk Restraint Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02364141 nacompletednot on this map

Trunk Restraint Therapy: the Continuous Use of the Harness Could Promote Feedback Dependence in Post-stroke Patients. A Randomized Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Campinas, BrazilRan2004 to 2008Enrolled40ConditionsStrokeArmsTrunk restraint therapy, Trunk unrestraint therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Modifying Kinect placement to improve upper limb joint angle measurement accuracy.Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Roberta de Oliveira CachoFrom the Faculty of Health Science at Trairi - Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (FACISA/UFRN) (RdOC, EWAC), Santa Cruz, RN; Department of Computer Engineering (RLO), Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of southern Minas (IFSULDEMINAS), Poços de Caldas, MG; Department of Electrical Engineering (AC), University of São Paulo - EESC/USP; Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (AC), Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas; and Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery (GB), Faculty of Medical Science, University of Campinas - UNICAMP, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Enio Walker A Cacho
Rodrigo L Ortolan
Alberto Cliquet
Guilherme Borges

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term effects of the task-specific training with trunk restraint compared with the free one in poststroke reaching movements. The design was randomized trial. The setting was University of Campinas (Unicamp). Twenty hemiparetic chronic stroke patients were selected and randomized into 2 training groups: trunk restraint group (TRG) (reaching training with trunk restraint) and trunk free group (TFG) (unrestraint reaching). Twenty sessions with 45 minutes of training were accomplished. The patients were evaluated in pretreatment (PRE), posttreatment (POST) and 3 months after the completed training (RET) (follow-up). Main outcome measures were modified Ashworth scale, Barthel index, Fugl-Meyer scale, and kinematic analysis (movement trajectory, velocity, angles). A significant improvement, which maintained in the RET test, was found in the motor (P < 0.001) and functional (P = 0.001) clinical assessments for both groups. For trunk displacement, only TFG obtained a reduction statistical significance from PRE to the POST test (P = 0.002), supporting this result in the RET test. Despite both groups presenting a significant increase in the shoulder horizontal adduction (P = 0.003), only TRG showed a significant improvement in the shoulder (P = 0.001--PRE to POST and RET) and elbow (P = 0.038--PRE to RET) flexion extension, and in the velocity rate (P = 0.03--PRE to RET). The trunk restraint therapy showed to be a long-term effective treatment in the enhancement of shoulder and elbow active joint range and velocity rate but not in the maintenance of trunk retention. Trial registration: NCT02364141.

Indexed as

FeedbackRestraint, PhysicalStroke RehabilitationAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleHemiplegiaHumansMaleMiddle AgedMovementStrokeUpper Extremity

Identifiers

PMID25816031
PMCPMC4554010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.