Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25815840›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Modeling the potential effects of new tobacco products and policies: a dynamic population model for multiple product use and harm.

Eric D Vugrin, Brian L Rostron, Stephen J Verzi, Nancy S Brodsky, Theresa J Brown, Conrad J Choiniere, Blair N Coleman, Antonio Paredes, Benjamin J Apelberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. US Nicotine Vaping ProductInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  9. Estimating the Population Health Impact of Recently Introduced Modified Risk Tobacco Products: A Comparison of Different Approaches.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2021
    Review
  10. E-cigarettes: The Long-Term Liberal Perspective.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Eric D VugrinResilience and Regulatory Effects, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States of America.
Brian L RostronCenter for Tobacco Products, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Springs, Maryland, United States of America.
Stephen J VerziSystems Research, Analysis and Applications, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States of America.
Nancy S BrodskyResilience and Regulatory Effects, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States of America.
Theresa J BrownPolicy and Decision Analytics, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States of America.
Conrad J ChoiniereCenter for Tobacco Products, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Springs, Maryland, United States of America.
Blair N ColemanCenter for Tobacco Products, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Springs, Maryland, United States of America.
Antonio ParedesCenter for Tobacco Products, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Springs, Maryland, United States of America.
Benjamin J ApelbergCenter for Tobacco Products, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Springs, Maryland, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent declines in US cigarette smoking prevalence have coincided with increases in use of other tobacco products. Multiple product tobacco models can help assess the population health impacts associated with use of a wide range of tobacco products. METHODS AND

findingsWe present a multi-state, dynamical systems population structure model that can be used to assess the effects of tobacco product use behaviors on population health. The model incorporates transition behaviors, such as initiation, cessation, switching, and dual use, related to the use of multiple products. The model tracks product use prevalence and mortality attributable to tobacco use for the overall population and by sex and age group. The model can also be used to estimate differences in these outcomes between scenarios by varying input parameter values. We demonstrate model capabilities by projecting future cigarette smoking prevalence and smoking-attributable mortality and then simulating the effects of introduction of a hypothetical new lower-risk tobacco product under a variety of assumptions about product use. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to examine the range of population impacts that could occur due to differences in input values for product use and risk. We demonstrate that potential benefits from cigarette smokers switching to the lower-risk product can be offset over time through increased initiation of this product. Model results show that population health benefits are particularly sensitive to product risks and initiation, switching, and dual use behaviors.

conclusionOur model incorporates the variety of tobacco use behaviors and risks that occur with multiple products. As such, it can evaluate the population health impacts associated with the introduction of new tobacco products or policies that may result in product switching or dual use. Further model development will include refinement of data inputs for non-cigarette tobacco products and inclusion of health outcomes such as morbidity and disability.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalCensusesHumansMortalityPopulationSmokingSmoking CessationTobacco ProductsTobacco Use Disorder

Identifiers

PMID25815840
PMCPMC4376806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.