ArticlePloS one2015
Variable importance and prediction methods for longitudinal problems with missing variables.
Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inference on summaries of a model-agnostic longitudinal variable importance trajectory with application to suicide prevention.The annals of applied statistics · 2026Article
- Importance of variables from different time frames for predicting self-harm using health system data.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2024Article
- Importance of variables from different time frames for predicting self-harm using health system data.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Considerations and targeted approaches to identifying bad actors in exposure mixtures.Statistics in biosciences · 2024Article
- Radiation-induced multi-organ injury.International journal of radiation biology · 2024Article
- Ensemble machine learning for the prediction of patient-level outcomes following thyroidectomy.American journal of surgery · 2021Article
- Ensemble machine learning prediction and variable importance analysis of 5-year mortality after cardiac valve and CABG operations.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- The major effects of health-related quality of life on 5-year survival prediction among lung cancer survivors: applications of machine learning.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Discrepancies between conventional and viscoelastic assays in identifying trauma-induced coagulopathy.American journal of surgery · 2019Observational
- All Models are Wrong, butJournal of machine learning research : JMLR · 2019Article
- Dynamic multi-outcome prediction after injury: Applying adaptive machine learning for precision medicine in trauma.PloS one · 2019Article
- Machine learning without borders? An adaptable tool to optimize mortality prediction in diverse clinical settings.The journal of trauma and acute care surgery · 2018Article
- Stacked generalization: an introduction to super learning.European journal of epidemiology · 2018Review
- Translational approaches to coagulopathy after trauma: Towards targeted treatment.PLoS medicine · 2017Article
- Factors associated with performing tuberculosis screening of HIV-positive patients in Ghana: LASSO-based predictor selection in a large public health data set.BMC public health · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present prediction and variable importance (VIM) methods for longitudinal data sets containing continuous and binary exposures subject to missingness. We demonstrate the use of these methods for prognosis of medical outcomes of severe trauma patients, a field in which current medical practice involves rules of thumb and scoring methods that only use a few variables and ignore the dynamic and high-dimensional nature of trauma recovery. Well-principled prediction and VIM methods can provide a tool to make care decisions informed by the high-dimensional patient's physiological and clinical history. Our VIM parameters are analogous to slope coefficients in adjusted regressions, but are not dependent on a specific statistical model, nor require a certain functional form of the prediction regression to be estimated. In addition, they can be causally interpreted under causal and statistical assumptions as the expected outcome under time-specific clinical interventions, related to changes in the mean of the outcome if each individual experiences a specified change in the variable (keeping other variables in the model fixed). Better yet, the targeted MLE used is doubly robust and locally efficient. Because the proposed VIM does not constrain the prediction model fit, we use a very flexible ensemble learner (the SuperLearner), which returns a linear combination of a list of user-given algorithms. Not only is such a prediction algorithm intuitive appealing, it has theoretical justification as being asymptotically equivalent to the oracle selector. The results of the analysis show effects whose size and significance would have been not been found using a parametric approach (such as stepwise regression or LASSO). In addition, the procedure is even more compelling as the predictor on which it is based showed significant improvements in cross-validated fit, for instance area under the curve (AUC) for a receiver-operator curve (ROC). Thus, given that 1) our VIM applies to any model fitting procedure, 2) under assumptions has meaningful clinical (causal) interpretations and 3) has asymptotic (influence-curve) based robust inference, it provides a compelling alternative to existing methods for estimating variable importance in high-dimensional clinical (or other) data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.