Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25815704›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2015

Bayesian model selection applied to the analysis of fluorescence correlation spectroscopy data of fluorescent proteins in vitro and in vivo.

Guangyu Sun, Syuan-Ming Guo, Cathleen Teh, Vladimir Korzh, Mark Bathe, Thorsten Wohland

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Guangyu Sun†Department of Chemistry, National University of Singapore, 117543 Singapore.
Syuan-Ming Guo§Laboratory for Computational Biology and Biophysics, Department of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States.
Cathleen Teh∥Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, 138673 Singapore.
Vladimir Korzh∥Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, 138673 Singapore.
Mark Bathe§Laboratory for Computational Biology and Biophysics, Department of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States.
Thorsten Wohland†Department of Chemistry, National University of Singapore, 117543 Singapore.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology · USNational University of Singapore · SGAgency for Science, Technology and Research · SGInstitute of Molecular and Cell Biology · SG

Funding

Ultra-Multiplexed Nanoscale In Situ Proteomics for Understanding Synapse TypesU01MH106011 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI BATHE, MARK, BOYDEN, EDWARD S. · 2014 to 2016
$2.2M
NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH106011NIMH NIH HHS U01MH106011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS) is a powerful technique to investigate molecular dynamics with single molecule sensitivity. In particular, in the life sciences it has found widespread application using fluorescent proteins as molecularly specific labels. However, FCS data analysis and interpretation using fluorescent proteins remains challenging due to typically low signal-to-noise ratio of FCS data and correlated noise in autocorrelated data sets. As a result, naive fitting procedures that ignore these important issues typically provide similarly good fits for multiple competing models without clear distinction of which model is preferred given the signal-to-noise ratio present in the data. Recently, we introduced a Bayesian model selection procedure to overcome this issue with FCS data analysis. The method accounts for the highly correlated noise that is present in FCS data sets and additionally penalizes model complexity to prevent over interpretation of FCS data. Here, we apply this procedure to evaluate FCS data from fluorescent proteins assayed in vitro and in vivo. Consistent with previous work, we demonstrate that model selection is strongly dependent on the signal-to-noise ratio of the measurement, namely, excitation intensity and measurement time, and is sensitive to saturation artifacts. Under fixed, low intensity excitation conditions, physical transport models can unambiguously be identified. However, at excitation intensities that are considered moderate in many studies, unwanted artifacts are introduced that result in nonphysical models to be preferred. We also determined the appropriate fitting models of a GFP tagged secreted signaling protein, Wnt3, in live zebrafish embryos, which is necessary for the investigation of Wnt3 expression and secretion in development. Bayes model selection therefore provides a robust procedure to determine appropriate transport and photophysical models for fluorescent proteins when appropriate models are provided, to help detect and eliminate experimental artifacts in solution, cells, and in living organisms.

Indexed as

AnimalsBayes TheoremCHO CellsCricetulusGreen Fluorescent ProteinsSpectrometry, FluorescenceWnt3 ProteinZebrafishGreen Fluorescent ProteinsWnt3 Protein

Identifiers

PMID25815704
PMCPMC4430836
OpenAlexW2333846167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.