Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25815584›Full record

ArticleeLife2015

Juxtaposition of heterozygous and homozygous regions causes reciprocal crossover remodelling via interference during Arabidopsis meiosis.

Piotr A Ziolkowski, Luke E Berchowitz, Christophe Lambing, Nataliya E Yelina, Xiaohui Zhao, Krystyna A Kelly, Kyuha Choi, Liliana Ziolkowska, Viviana June, Eugenio Sanchez-Moran and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 153 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Histone variant H2A.W7 represses meiotic crossover formation inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Accumulation ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The recombination landscape of introgression in yeast.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 5 countries.

Piotr A ZiolkowskiDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Luke E BerchowitzDepartment of Biology and the Carolina Center for Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States.
Christophe LambingDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Nataliya E YelinaDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Xiaohui ZhaoDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Krystyna A KellyDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Kyuha ChoiDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Liliana ZiolkowskaDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Viviana JuneDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Eugenio Sanchez-MoranSchool of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Chris FranklinSchool of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Gregory P CopenhaverDepartment of Biology and the Carolina Center for Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7962-3862
Ian R HendersonDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
University of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GBUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/K007882/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M004937/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During meiosis homologous chromosomes undergo crossover recombination. Sequence differences between homologs can locally inhibit crossovers. Despite this, nucleotide diversity and population-scaled recombination are positively correlated in eukaryote genomes. To investigate interactions between heterozygosity and recombination we crossed Arabidopsis lines carrying fluorescent crossover reporters to 32 diverse accessions and observed hybrids with significantly higher and lower crossovers than homozygotes. Using recombinant populations derived from these crosses we observed that heterozygous regions increase crossovers when juxtaposed with homozygous regions, which reciprocally decrease. Total crossovers measured by chiasmata were unchanged when heterozygosity was varied, consistent with homeostatic control. We tested the effects of heterozygosity in mutants where the balance of interfering and non-interfering crossover repair is altered. Crossover remodeling at homozygosity-heterozygosity junctions requires interference, and non-interfering repair is inefficient in heterozygous regions. As a consequence, heterozygous regions show stronger crossover interference. Our findings reveal how varying homolog polymorphism patterns can shape meiotic recombination.

Indexed as

Crossing Over, GeneticArabidopsisChromosomes, PlantCrosses, GeneticEcotypeFluorescenceGenetic VariationGenotypeHeterozygoteHomozygoteMeiosisarabidopsischromosomescrossoverevolutionary biologygenesgenomicsinterferencemeiosisnatural variationrecombination

Identifiers

PMID25815584
PMCPMC4407271
OpenAlexW2079905397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.