ArticlePloS one2015
Classification and characterization of species within the genus lens using genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS).
Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Conventional and new-breeding technologies for improving disease resistance in lentil (Frontiers in plant science · 2022Pooled it
- Genomic differentiation and SNP variation reveal local adaptations to eastern Mediterranean environmental conditions in wild radishes.Annals of botany · 2026Article
- Insights into lentil diversity, domestication, and the genetic basis of important agronomic traits through resequencing of 238 Lens accessions.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2026Article
- Comparative oligo-FISH validates genome assemblies and delivers a precise karyotype for Lens Mill. species.PloS one · 2026Article
- Gene co-expression analysis reveals conserved and distinct gene networks between resistant and susceptible Lens ervoides challenged by hemibiotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Omics-Driven Strategies for Developing Saline-Smart Lentils: A Comprehensive Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Drought stress inPhysiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2024Review
- Genome Size Variation across a Cypriot Fabeae Tribe Germplasm Collection.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Diploid chromosome-level reference genome and population genomic analyses provide insights into Gypenoside biosynthesis and demographic evolution ofHorticulture research · 2023Article
- The Prospects of gene introgression from crop wild relatives into cultivated lentil for climate change mitigation.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Review
- Complete chloroplast genome sequence of Lens ervoides and comparison to Lens culinaris.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Supporting in situ conservation of the genetic diversity of crop wild relatives using genomic technologies.Molecular ecology · 2022Review
- Unlocking the hidden variation from wild repository for accelerating genetic gain in legumes.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Review
- RNA-Seq and Gene Ontology Analysis Reveal Differences Associated With Low R/FR-Induced Shade Responses in Cultivated Lentil and a Wild Relative.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Protein Biofortification in Lentils (Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Root Trait Variation in Lentil (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Integrating Genomic and Phenomic Approaches to Support Plant Genetic Resources Conservation and Use.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Genetic diversity and main functional composition of Lingzhi strains from main producing areas in China.AMB Express · 2021Article
- The complete chloroplast genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lentil (Lens culinaris ssp. culinaris) is a nutritious and affordable pulse with an ancient crop domestication history. The genus Lens consists of seven taxa, however, there are many discrepancies in the taxon and gene pool classification of lentil and its wild relatives. Due to the narrow genetic basis of cultivated lentil, there is a need towards better understanding of the relationships amongst wild germplasm to assist introgression of favourable genes into lentil breeding programs. Genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) is an easy and affordable method that allows multiplexing of up to 384 samples or more per library to generate genome-wide single nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) markers. In this study, we aimed to characterize our lentil germplasm collection using a two-enzyme GBS approach. We constructed two 96-plex GBS libraries with a total of 60 accessions where some accessions had several samples and each sample was sequenced in two technical replicates. We developed an automated GBS pipeline and detected a total of 266,356 genome-wide SNPs. After filtering low quality and redundant SNPs based on haplotype information, we constructed a maximum-likelihood tree using 5,389 SNPs. The phylogenetic tree grouped the germplasm collection into their respective taxa with strong support. Based on phylogenetic tree and STRUCTURE analysis, we identified four gene pools, namely L. culinaris/L. orientalis/L. tomentosus, L. lamottei/L. odemensis, L. ervoides and L. nigricans which form primary, secondary, tertiary and quaternary gene pools, respectively. We discovered sequencing bias problems likely due to DNA quality and observed severe run-to-run variation in the wild lentils. We examined the authenticity of the germplasm collection and identified 17% misclassified samples. Our study demonstrated that GBS is a promising and affordable tool for screening by plant breeders interested in crop wild relatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.