ArticleAnnals of clinical and translational neurology2015
Optimizing multiple sclerosis diagnosis: gene expression and genomic association.
Article in Annals of clinical and translational neurology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dysregulated lipid metabolism networks modulate T-cell function in people with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.Clinical and experimental immunology · 2024Article
- Laboratory Diagnosis of Intrathecal Synthesis of Immunoglobulins: A Review about the Contribution of OCBs and K-index.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Inferring Multiple Sclerosis Stages from the Blood Transcriptome via Machine Learning.Cell reports. Medicine · 2020Article
- Host cell virus entry mechanisms enhance anti-JCV-antibody switch in natalizumab-treated multiple sclerosis patients.Journal of neurovirology · 2016Observational
- Disease-Modifying Therapies in Multiple Sclerosis: Overview and Treatment Considerations.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2016Article
- No differential gene expression for CD4Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinicalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS) at disease onset is sometimes masqueraded by other diagnostic options resembling MS clinically or radiologically (NonMS). In the present study we utilized findings of large-scale Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) to develop a blood gene expression-based classification tool to assist in diagnosis during the first demyelinating event.
methodsWe have merged knowledge of 110 MS susceptibility genes gained from MS GWAS studies together with our experimental results of differential blood gene expression profiling between 80 MS and 31 NonMS patients. Multiple classification algorithms were applied to this cohort to construct a diagnostic classifier that correctly distinguished between MS and NonMS patients. Accuracy of the classifier was tested on an additional independent group of 146 patients including 121 MS and 25 NonMS patients.
resultsWe have constructed a 42 gene-transcript expression-based MS diagnostic classifier. The overall accuracy of the classifier, as tested on an independent patient population consisting of diagnostically challenging cases including NonMS patients with positive MRI findings, achieved a correct classification rate of 76.0 ± 3.5%.
interpretationThe presented diagnostic classification tool complements the existing diagnostic McDonald criteria by assisting in the accurate exclusion of other neurological diseases at presentation of the first demyelinating event suggestive of MS.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.