Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25815327›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2015

Temozolomide and radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in high grade gliomas: a very long term comparative study and literature review.

Salvatore Parisi, Pietro Corsa, Arcangela Raguso, Antonio Perrone, Sabrina Cossa, Tindara Munafò, Gerardo Sanpaolo, Elisa Donno, Maria Antonietta Clemente, Michele Piombino and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Study
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Translational gap in ongoing clinical trials for glioma.Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia · 2018
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Salvatore ParisiUnit of Radiation Therapy of IRCCS "Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza", 71013 San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy ; Radiotherapy Unit, Scientific Institute "Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza", Viale Cappuccini, 71013 San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy.
Pietro CorsaUnit of Radiation Therapy of IRCCS "Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza", 71013 San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy.
Arcangela RagusoUnit of Radiation Therapy of IRCCS "Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza", 71013 San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy.
Antonio PerroneUnit of Radiation Therapy of IRCCS "Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza", 71013 San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy.
Sabrina CossaUnit of Radiation Therapy of IRCCS "Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza", 71013 San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy.
Tindara MunafòUnit of Radiation Therapy of IRCCS "Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza", 71013 San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy.
Gerardo SanpaoloUnit of Radiation Therapy of IRCCS "Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza", 71013 San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy.
Elisa DonnoUnit of Radiation Therapy of IRCCS "Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza", 71013 San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy.
Maria Antonietta ClementeUnit of Radiation Therapy of IRCCS "Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza", 71013 San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy.
Michele PiombinoUnit of Radiation Therapy of Policlinico, 70124 Bari, Italy.
Federico ParisiUniversity of Chieti, 66100 Chieti, Italy.
Guido ValleUnit of Nuclear Medicine of IRCCS "Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza", San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy.
Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITUniversity of Chieti-Pescara · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledTemozolomide (TMZ) is the first line drug in the care of high grade gliomas. The combined treatment of TMZ plus radiotherapy is more effective in the care of brain gliomas then radiotherapy alone. Aim of this report is a survival comparison, on a long time (>10 years) span, of glioma patients treated with radiotherapy alone and with radiotherapy + TMZ. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this report we retrospectively reviewed the outcome of 128 consecutive pts with diagnosis of high grade gliomas referred to our institutions from April 1994 to November 2001. The first 64 pts were treated with RT alone and the other 64 with a combination of RT and adjuvant or concomitant TMZ.

resultsGrade 3 (G3) haematological toxicity was recorded in 6 (9%) of 64 pts treated with RT and TMZ. No G4 haematological toxicity was observed. Age, histology, and administration of TMZ were statistically significant prognostic factors associated with 2 years overall survival (OS). PFS was for GBM 9 months, for AA 11.

conclusionsThe combination of RT and TMZ improves long term survival in glioma patients. Our results confirm the superiority of the combination on a long time basis.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBrain NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyDacarbazineFemaleGliomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTemozolomideDacarbazineTemozolomide

Identifiers

PMID25815327
PMCPMC4359808
OpenAlexW2029982124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.