Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25815197›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical policy and practice2015

The "child size medicines" concept: policy provisions in Uganda.

Xavier Nsabagasani, Jasper Ogwal-Okeng, Anthony Mbonye, Freddie Ssengooba, Rebecca Nantanda, Herbert Muyinda, Ebba Holme Hansen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Management of human resources for health in health districts in Uganda: A decision space analysis.The International journal of health planning and management · 2022
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xavier NsabagasaniChild Health and Development Center, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Jasper Ogwal-Okeng *Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Gulu University, Gulu, Uganda.
Anthony Mbonye *Department of Community Health, Ministry of Health Uganda, Kampala, Uganda.
Freddie Ssengooba *School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Rebecca Nantanda *Child Health and Development Center, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Herbert Muyinda *Child Health and Development Center, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Ebba Holme Hansen *Department of Pharmacy, Section for Social and Clinical Pharmacy, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2007, the World Health Organization (WHO) launched the 'make medicines child size' (MMCS) campaign by urging countries to prioritize procurement of medicines with appropriate strengths for children's age and weight and, in child-friendly formulations of rectal and flexible oral solid formulations. This study examined policy provisions for MMCS recommendations in Uganda.

methodsThis was an in-depth case study of the Ugandan health policy documents to assess provisions for MMCS recommendations in respect to oral and rectal medicine formulations for malaria, pneumonia and diarrhea, the major causes of morbidity and mortality among children in Uganda- diseases that were also emphasized in the MMCS campaign. Asthma and epilepsy were included as conditions that require long term care. Schistomiasis was included as a neglected tropical disease. Content analysis was used to assess evidence of policy provisions for the MMCS recommendations.

resultsFor most medicines for the selected diseases, appropriate strength for children's age and weight was addressed especially in the EMHSLU 2012. However, policy documents neither referred to 'child size medicines' concept nor provided for flexible oral solid dosage formulations like dispersible tablets, pellets and granules- indicating limited adherence to MMCS recommendations. Some of the medicines recommended in the clinical guidelines as first line treatment for malaria and pneumonia among children were not evidence-based.

conclusionThe Ugandan health policy documents reflected limited adherence to the MMCS recommendations. This and failure to use evidence based medicines may result into treatment failure and or death. A revision of the current policies and guidelines to better reflect 'child size', child appropriate and evidence based medicines for children is recommended.

Indexed as

‘Child size medicines’Essential medicinesGuidelinesPolicyUganda

Identifiers

PMID25815197
PMCPMC4342089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.