Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25815173›Full record

ArticleClinical kidney journal2015

The intestine and the kidneys: a bad marriage can be hazardous.

Raymond Vanholder, Griet Glorieux

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03877081 (Effect of Probiotics and Prebiotics in Renal Function in Septic Acute Kidney Injury Patients, Randomized Control Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 56 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03877081 phase3unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Probiotics and Prebiotics in Renal Function in Septic Acute Kidney Injury Patients, Randomized Control Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital Civil de GuadalajaraRan2019 to 2023Enrolled90ConditionsAcute Kidney Injury, Probiotics, SepsisArmsProbiotics, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Synbiotics Easing Renal Failure by Improving Gut Microbiology (SYNERGY): A Randomized Trial.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2016
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Probiotics for kidney disease.Clinical kidney journal · 2022
    Article
  18. Farewell from theClinical kidney journal · 2022
    Article
  19. Preventive effects of theFrontiers in pharmacology · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Raymond VanholderNephrology Section, 0K12 , University Hospital , Ghent B9000 , Belgium.
Griet GlorieuxNephrology Section, 0K12 , University Hospital , Ghent B9000 , Belgium.
Ghent University Hospital · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The concept that the intestine and chronic kidney disease influence each other, emerged only recently. The problem is multifaceted and bidirectional. On one hand, the composition of the intestinal microbiota impacts uraemic retention solute production, resulting in the generation of essentially protein-bound uraemic toxins with strong biological impact such as vascular damage and progression of kidney failure. On the other hand, the uraemic status affects the composition of intestinal microbiota, the generation of uraemic retention solutes and their precursors and causes disturbances in the protective epithelial barrier of the intestine and the translocation of intestinal microbiota into the body. All these elements together contribute to the disruption of the metabolic equilibrium and homeostasis typical to uraemia. Several measures with putative impact on intestinal status have recently been tested for their influence on the generation or concentration of uraemic toxins. These include dietary measures, prebiotics, probiotics, synbiotics and intestinal sorbents. Unfortunately, the quality and the evidence base of many of these studies are debatable, especially in uraemia, and often results within one study or among studies are contradictory. Nevertheless, intestinal uraemic metabolite generation remains an interesting target to obtain in the future as an alternative or additive to dialysis to decrease uraemic toxin generation. In the present review, we aim to summarize (i) the role of the intestine in uraemia by producing uraemic toxins and by generating pathophysiologically relevant changes, (ii) the role of uraemia in modifying intestinal physiology and (iii) the therapeutic options that could help to modify these effects and the studies that have assessed the impact of these therapies.

Indexed as

CKDcreatininehaemodialysissystematic reviewuraemic toxins

Identifiers

PMID25815173
PMCPMC4370304
OpenAlexW2117844887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.