ReviewWorld journal of stem cells2015
Evaluating alternative stem cell hypotheses for adult corneal epithelial maintenance.
Review in World journal of stem cells, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.
- Long-Read Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Reveals Dynamic Isoform Changes During Corneal Epithelial Wound Healing in Cynomolgus Monkeys.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Intercellular forces driving stratification in a two-layer corneal epithelium: Insight from a Voronoi cell-based simulation model.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Article
- Recent Advances in Stem Cells of Corneal Epithelia.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Review
- Article
- Review
- Two-Photon and Multiphoton Microscopy in Anterior Segment Diseases of the Eye.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Eyes open on stem cells.Stem cell reports · 2023Review
- Corneal wound healing and nerve regeneration by novel ophthalmic formulations based on cross-linked sodium hyaluronate, taurine, vitamin B6, and vitamin B12.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Article
- Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Corneal Cells: Current Status and Application.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2022Review
- Substance P/neurokinin-1 receptor pathway blockade ameliorates limbal stem cell deficiency by modulating mTOR pathway and preventing cell senescence.Stem cell reports · 2022Article
- Two-photon live imaging of single corneal stem cells reveals compartmentalized organization of the limbal niche.Cell stem cell · 2021Article
- The common YAP activation mediates corneal epithelial regeneration and repair with different-sized wounds.NPJ Regenerative medicine · 2021Article
- Spatial correlations constrain cellular lifespan and pattern formation in corneal epithelium homeostasis.eLife · 2021Article
- Agrin Promotes Limbal Stem Cell Proliferation and Corneal Wound Healing Through Hippo-Yap Signaling Pathway.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2020Article
- Corneal Stem Cells as a Source of Regenerative Cell-Based Therapy.Stem cells international · 2020Review
- Influence of polydimethylsiloxane substrate stiffness on corneal epithelial cells.Royal Society open science · 2019Article
- Assessment of corneal substrate biomechanics and its effect on epithelial stem cell maintenance and differentiation.Nature communications · 2019Article
- "Basal Cell Migration" in Regeneration of the Corneal Wound-Bed.Stem cell reports · 2019Article
- Computer simulation of neutral drift among limbal epithelial stem cells of mosaic mice.Stem cell research · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In this review we evaluate evidence for three different hypotheses that explain how the corneal epithelium is maintained. The limbal epithelial stem cell (LESC) hypothesis is most widely accepted. This proposes that stem cells in the basal layer of the limbal epithelium, at the periphery of the cornea, maintain themselves and also produce transient (or transit) amplifying cells (TACs). TACs then move centripetally to the centre of the cornea in the basal layer of the corneal epithelium and also replenish cells in the overlying suprabasal layers. The LESCs maintain the corneal epithelium during normal homeostasis and become more active to repair significant wounds. Second, the corneal epithelial stem cell (CESC) hypothesis postulates that, during normal homeostasis, stem cells distributed throughout the basal corneal epithelium, maintain the tissue. According to this hypothesis, LESCs are present in the limbus but are only active during wound healing. We also consider a third possibility, that the corneal epithelium is maintained during normal homeostasis by proliferation of basal corneal epithelial cells without any input from stem cells. After reviewing the published evidence, we conclude that the LESC and CESC hypotheses are consistent with more of the evidence than the third hypothesis, so we do not consider this further. The LESC and CESC hypotheses each have difficulty accounting for one main type of evidence so we evaluate the two key lines of evidence that discriminate between them. Finally, we discuss how lineage-tracing experiments have begun to resolve the debate in favour of the LESC hypothesis. Nevertheless, it also seems likely that some basal corneal epithelial cells can act as long-term progenitors if limbal stem cell function is compromised. Thus, this aspect of the CESC hypothesis may have a lasting impact on our understanding of corneal epithelial maintenance, even if it is eventually shown that stem cells are restricted to the limbus as proposed by the LESC hypothesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.