ReviewJournal of environmental and public health2015
Successful strategies to engage research partners for translating evidence into action in community health: a critical review.
Review in Journal of environmental and public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.
- 'We need a warm hug to remind us that we are loved': a qualitative study of psychosocial health and wellbeing among lesbian forced migrants.BMC public health · 2026Article
- A Community Advisory Board's Role in Disseminating Tai Chi Prime in African American and Latinx Communities: A Pragmatic Application of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Desiring support on a winding road with challenging intersections: Social and professional support for sexual minority forced migrant men.Journal of advanced nursing · 2025Article
- Experiences on the implementation and maintenance of the Canadian Disability Participation Project: A mixed-methods study.PloS one · 2025Article
- "… Work Really Is Being Done and It's Very Worthwhile …": Reflections from Community Advisory Board Members.Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action · 2025Article
- Adopting an Integrative and Co-Design Process to Contextualize Management Capacity Building in Hospitals.Journal of healthcare leadership · 2025Article
- Participatory Approaches in the Context of Research Into Workplace Health Promotion to Improve Physical Activity Levels and Reduce Sedentary Behavior Among Office-Based Workers: Scoping Review.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2024Article
- Exploring power and power sharing in participatory health research partnerships: A scoping review protocol.PloS one · 2024Article
- Systematic overviews of partnership principles and strategies identified from health research about spinal cord injury and related health conditions: A scoping review.The journal of spinal cord medicine · 2023Article
- Evaluating the implementation of community engagement guidelines (EVALUA GPS project): a study protocol.BMJ open · 2023Article
- Voices of women in homelessness during the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic: a co-created qualitative study.BMC women's health · 2023Article
- Institutionalizing Community-engaged Translational Science in an Academic Institution: A Community Stakeholder-Driven Process.Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action · 2023Article
- The public and patient involvement imperative in Ireland: Building on policy drivers.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Cooperative planning and its utilization in German physical activity promotion: a brief introduction.Health promotion international · 2021Article
- It Starts with a Conversation: The Importance of Values as Building Blocks of Engagement Strategies in Community-Centered Public Health Research.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Violence Prevention Through Mentoring for Youth with Emergency Department Treated Peer Assault Injuries.The journal of pediatrics: X · 2021Article
- Key issues for participatory research in the design and implementation of humanitarian assistance: a scoping review.Global health action · 2020Article
- Stakeholders' experiences of the public health research process: time to change the system?Health research policy and systems · 2020Article
- Co-Design in the Development of a Mobile Health App for the Management of Knee Osteoarthritis by Patients and Physicians: Qualitative Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2020Article
- Partnership Processes to Develop SHE Tribe: A Healthy Lifestyle Intervention.Health promotion practice · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo undertake a critical review describing key strategies supporting development of participatory research (PR) teams to engage partners for creation and translation of action-oriented knowledge.
methodsSources are four leading PR practitioners identified via bibliometric analysis. Authors' publications were identified in January 1995-October 2009 in PubMed, Embase, ISI Web of Science and CAB databases, and books. Works were limited to those with a process description describing a research project and practitioners were first, second, third, or last author.
resultsAdapting and applying the "Reliability Tested Guidelines for Assessing Participatory Research Projects" to retained records identified five key strategies: developing advisory committees of researchers and intended research users; developing research agreements; using formal and informal group facilitation techniques; hiring co-researchers/partners from community; and ensuring frequent communication. Other less frequently mentioned strategies were also identified.
conclusionThis review is the first time these guidelines were used to identify key strategies supporting PR projects. They proved effective at identifying and evaluating engagement strategies as reported by completed research projects. Adapting these guidelines identified gaps where the tool was unable to assess fundamental PR elements of power dynamics, equity of resources, and member turnover. Our resulting template serves as a new tool to measure partnerships.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.