Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25814999›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2015

Large genetic screens for gynogenesis and androgenesis haploid inducers in Arabidopsis thaliana failed to identify mutants.

Virginie Portemer, Charlotte Renne, Alexia Guillebaux, Raphael Mercier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Recent Progress on Plant Apomixis for Genetic Improvement.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Embryo Rescue in Plant Breeding.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  4. State-of-the-art and novel developments of in vivo haploid technologies.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2019
    Review
  5. The HEM Lines: A New Library of HomozygousFrontiers in plant science · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Virginie PortemerINRA, UMR1318, Institut Jean-Pierre Bourgin Versailles, France ; AgroParisTech, Institut Jean-Pierre Bourgin Versailles, France.
Charlotte RenneINRA, UMR1318, Institut Jean-Pierre Bourgin Versailles, France ; AgroParisTech, Institut Jean-Pierre Bourgin Versailles, France.
Alexia GuillebauxINRA, UMR1318, Institut Jean-Pierre Bourgin Versailles, France ; AgroParisTech, Institut Jean-Pierre Bourgin Versailles, France.
Raphael MercierINRA, UMR1318, Institut Jean-Pierre Bourgin Versailles, France ; AgroParisTech, Institut Jean-Pierre Bourgin Versailles, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gynogenesis is a process in which the embryo genome originates exclusively from female origin, following embryogenesis stimulation by a male gamete. In contrast, androgenesis is the development of embryos that contain only the male nuclear genetic background. Both phenomena are of great interest in plant breeding as haploidization is an efficient tool to reduce the length of breeding schemes to create varieties. Although few inducer lines have been described, the genetic control of these phenomena is poorly understood. We developed genetic screens to identify mutations that would induce gynogenesis or androgenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. The ability of mutant pollen to induce either gynogenesis or androgenesis was tested by crossing mutagenized plants as males. Seedlings from these crosses were screened with recessive phenotypic markers, one genetically controlled by the female genome and another by the male genome. Positive and negative controls confirmed the unambiguous detection of both gynogenesis and androgenesis events. This strategy was applied to 1,666 EMS-mutagenised lines and 47 distant Arabidopsis strains. While an internal control suggested that the mutagenesis reached saturation, no gynogenesis or androgenesis inducer was found. However, spontaneous gynogenesis was observed at a frequency of 1/10,800. Altogether, these results suggest that no simple EMS-induced mutation in the male genome is able to induce gynogenesis or androgenesis in Arabidopsis.

Indexed as

androgenesisArabidopsis thalianaEMS mutagenesisgenetic screengynogenesishaploid

Identifiers

PMID25814999
PMCPMC4357253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.