Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25814829›Full record

ArticleMolecular vision2015

Lens capsule structure assessed with atomic force microscopy.

Vivian M Sueiras, Vincent T Moy, Noël M Ziebarth

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular vision, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. ErbBs in Lens Cell Fibrosis and Secondary Cataract.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Self assembly of model polymers into biological random networks.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vivian M SueirasDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Miami College of Engineering, Coral Gables, FL.
Vincent T MoyDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL.
Noël M ZiebarthDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Miami College of Engineering, Coral Gables, FL.
University of Miami · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo image the ultrastructure of the anterior lens capsule at the nanoscale level using atomic force microscopy (AFM).

methodsExperiments were performed on anterior lens capsules maintained in their in situ location surrounding the lens from six human cadavers (donor age range: 44-88 years), four cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis age range: 4.83-8.92 years), and seven pigs (<6 months). Hydration of all samples was maintained using Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM). Whole lenses were removed from the eye and placed anterior side up in agarose gel before gel hardening where only the posterior half of the lens was contained within the gel. After the gel hardened, the Petri dish was filled with DMEM until the point where the intact lens was fully submerged. AFM was used to image the anterior lens surface in contact mode. An integrated analysis program was used to calculate the interfibrillar spacing, fiber diameter, and surface roughness of the samples.

resultsThe AFM images depict a highly ordered fibrous structure at the surface of the lens capsule in all three species. The interfibrillar spacing for the porcine, cynomolgus monkey, and human lens capsules was 0.68±0.25, 1.80±0.39, and 1.08±0.25 μm, respectively. In the primate, interfibrillar spacing significantly decreased linearly as a function of age. The fiber diameters ranged from 50 to 950 nm. Comparison of the root mean square (RMS) and average deviation demonstrate that the surface of the porcine lens capsule is the smoothest, and that the human and cynomolgus monkey capsules are significantly rougher.

conclusionsAFM was successful in providing high-resolution images of the nanostructure of the lens capsule samples. Species-dependent differences were observed in the overall structure and surface roughness.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnimalsHumansLens Capsule, CrystallineMacaca fascicularisMicroscopy, Atomic ForceMiddle AgedSpecies SpecificitySurface PropertiesSwine

Identifiers

PMID25814829
PMCPMC4360172
OpenAlexW2146073364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.