ArticleMolecular vision2015
Lens capsule structure assessed with atomic force microscopy.
Article in Molecular vision, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optical Coherence Elastography Measures Mechanical Tension in the Lens and Capsule.Acta biomaterialia · 2025Article
- Mechanical Properties of Eye Lens Cortical and Nuclear Membranes and the Whole Lens.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
- Quantifying ABCA1/apoA-1 Signaling Pathways with AFM Imaging and Lipidomic Analysis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- ErbBs in Lens Cell Fibrosis and Secondary Cataract.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2023Article
- Comparison of INTREPID® balanced and hybrid tips on anterior capsule rupture in ex vivo porcine eyes.PloS one · 2023Article
- Capsulotomy enlargement after femtosecond laser treatment among cataract patients of different age groups: a retrospective case series.American journal of translational research · 2023Article
- Simulation of defects, flexibility and rupture in biopolymer networks.RSC advances · 2022Article
- Ex-Vivo Method to Quantifiably Evaluate the Staining Effectiveness of Anterior Lens Capsule Dyes.Translational vision science & technology · 2021Article
- Self assembly of model polymers into biological random networks.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021Article
- Age-dependency of molecular diffusion in the human anterior lens capsule assessed using fluorescence recovery after photobleaching.Molecular vision · 2019Article
- Fibronectin regulates growth factor signaling and cell differentiation in primary lens cells.Journal of cell science · 2018Article
- Micromorphology analysis of the anterior human lens capsule.Molecular vision · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo image the ultrastructure of the anterior lens capsule at the nanoscale level using atomic force microscopy (AFM).
methodsExperiments were performed on anterior lens capsules maintained in their in situ location surrounding the lens from six human cadavers (donor age range: 44-88 years), four cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis age range: 4.83-8.92 years), and seven pigs (<6 months). Hydration of all samples was maintained using Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM). Whole lenses were removed from the eye and placed anterior side up in agarose gel before gel hardening where only the posterior half of the lens was contained within the gel. After the gel hardened, the Petri dish was filled with DMEM until the point where the intact lens was fully submerged. AFM was used to image the anterior lens surface in contact mode. An integrated analysis program was used to calculate the interfibrillar spacing, fiber diameter, and surface roughness of the samples.
resultsThe AFM images depict a highly ordered fibrous structure at the surface of the lens capsule in all three species. The interfibrillar spacing for the porcine, cynomolgus monkey, and human lens capsules was 0.68±0.25, 1.80±0.39, and 1.08±0.25 μm, respectively. In the primate, interfibrillar spacing significantly decreased linearly as a function of age. The fiber diameters ranged from 50 to 950 nm. Comparison of the root mean square (RMS) and average deviation demonstrate that the surface of the porcine lens capsule is the smoothest, and that the human and cynomolgus monkey capsules are significantly rougher.
conclusionsAFM was successful in providing high-resolution images of the nanostructure of the lens capsule samples. Species-dependent differences were observed in the overall structure and surface roughness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25814829PMC4360172W2146073364What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.