Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25814474›Full record

Observational studyJournal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN2015

A Lifetime of Allograft Function with Kidneys from Older Donors.

Caren Rose, Elke Schaeffner, Ulrich Frei, Jagbir Gill, John S Gill

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. [Kidney transplantation].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Rationale for Surrogate Endpoints and Conditional Marketing Authorization of New Therapies for Kidney Transplantation.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2022
    Review
  8. Transplanting kidneys from donors with small renal masses - a strategy to expand the donor pool.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. GFR Evaluation in Living Kidney Donor Candidates.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2017
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Caren RoseDivision of Nephrology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada;
Elke SchaeffnerDivision of Nephrology, Charité University Medicine, Berlin, Germany;
Ulrich FreiDivision of Nephrology, Charité University Medicine, Berlin, Germany;
Jagbir GillDivision of Nephrology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Center for Health Evaluation and Outcomes Sciences, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; and.
John S GillDivision of Nephrology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Center for Health Evaluation and Outcomes Sciences, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; and Division of Nephrology, Tufts-New England Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts jgill@providencehealth.bc.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Strategies to increase expanded criteria donor (ECD) transplantation are needed. We quantified the extent to which ECD kidneys provide recipients with a lifetime of allograft function by determining the difference between patient survival and death-censored allograft survival (graft survival). Initial analyses compared 5-year outcomes in the Eurotransplant Senior Program (European) and the United States Renal Data System. Among European recipients ≥65 years, patient survival exceeded graft survival, and ECD recipients returned to dialysis for an average of 5.2 months after transplant failure. Among United States recipients ≥60 years, graft survival exceeded patient survival. Although patient survival in elderly recipients in the United States was low (49% at 5 years), the average difference in patient survival at 10 years in elderly recipients in the United States with an ECD versus non-ECD transplant was only 7 months. The probability of patient survival with a functioning allograft at 5 years was higher with ECD transplantation within 1 year after activation to the waiting list than with delayed non-ECD transplantation ≥3 years after activation to the waiting list. Subsequent analyses demonstrated that ECD transplants do not provide a lifetime of allograft function in recipients <50 years in the United States. These findings should encourage ECD transplantation in patients ≥60 years, demonstrate that rapid ECD transplantation is superior to delayed non-ECD transplantation, and challenge the policy in the United States of allowing patients <50 years to receive an ECD transplant.

Indexed as

Kidney TransplantationAdolescentAdultAge FactorsAllograftsFemaleGraft SurvivalHumansKidneyMaleMiddle AgedTime FactorsTissue and Organ ProcurementTissue DonorsUnited StatesYoung Adultcadaver organ transplantationexpanded criteria donorshealth policysurvivaltransplantation

Identifiers

PMID25814474
PMCPMC4587698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.