Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25814400›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Immunology2015

Immune biomarkers: the promises and pitfalls of personalized medicine.

Joanna C D Willis, Graham M Lord

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Immunology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A global metric of immune health.Nature medicine · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Irradiation immunity interactions.Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. The impact of the prolonged COVID-19 pandemic on stress resilience and mental health: A critical review across waves.European neuropsychopharmacology : the journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Impact of treatment on cellular immunophenotype in MS: A cross-sectional study.Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Joanna C D WillisDepartment of Experimental Immunobiology, Medical Research Council Centre for Transplantation, King's College London, SE1 9RT, UK, and at the National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK.
Graham M LordDepartment of Experimental Immunobiology, Medical Research Council Centre for Transplantation, King's College London, SE1 9RT, UK, and at the National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK.

Funding

British Heart Foundation PG/12/36/29444Medical Research Council G0802068Medical Research Council M003493Medical Research Council MR/M003493/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Substantial progress in molecular immunology, coupled with an increasing focus on translational research and an enthusiasm for personalized medicine, has resulted in a rapid expansion in the field of immune biomarkers in recent years. In this Science and Society article, we provide a conceptual overview of the field and discuss the progress that has been made so far, as well as the future potential in the context of the scientific, logistical, financial, legal and ethical framework within which this research is being carried out and translated into clinical use.

Indexed as

BiomarkersHumansImmune System DiseasesPrecision MedicineBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID25814400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.