Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25813677›Full record

ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2015

Inhaled nitric oxide in preterm infants with prolonged preterm rupture of the membranes: a case series.

J Semberova, S M O'Donnell, J Franta, J Miletin

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. When to say no to inhaled nitric oxide in neonates?Seminars in fetal & neonatal medicine · 2021
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

J Semberova1] Department of Neonatology, The Coombe Women and Infants University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland [2] Institute for the Care of Mother and Child, Prague, Czech Republic.
S M O'DonnellDepartment of Neonatology, The Coombe Women and Infants University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
J FrantaDepartment of Neonatology, The Coombe Women and Infants University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
J Miletin1] Department of Neonatology, The Coombe Women and Infants University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland [2] Institute for the Care of Mother and Child, Prague, Czech Republic [3] Department of Paediatrics, UCD School of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The available evidence does not support the routine use of inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) in the care of premature infants. We present a case series of 22 preterm infants born after prolonged preterm premature rupture of membranes and oligohydramnios with respiratory failure. Oxygenation index decreased significantly after commencement of iNO.

Indexed as

Infant, PrematureAdministration, InhalationBronchopulmonary DysplasiaFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornLeukomalacia, PeriventricularMaleNitric OxidePremature Rupture of Fetal MembranesRespiratory InsufficiencyVasodilator AgentsNitric OxideVasodilator Agents

Identifiers

PMID25813677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.