Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25813429›Full record

ReviewTrends in cell biology2015

Mechanisms of epithelial wound detection.

Balázs Enyedi, Philipp Niethammer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in cell biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Physical models of embryonic epithelial healing.PLoS computational biology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Balázs EnyediCell Biology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Philipp NiethammerCell Biology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA. Electronic address: niethamp@mskcc.org.

Funding

Regulation of Wound Detection in Animal TissuesR01GM099970 · NIGMS · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI NIETHAMMER, PHILIPP MICHAEL · 2012 to 2020
$3.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM099970NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM099970
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Efficient wound healing requires the coordinated responses of various cell types within an injured tissue. To react to the presence of a wound, cells have to first detect it. Judging from their initial biochemical and morphological responses, many cells including leukocytes, epithelial cells, and endothelial cells detect wounds from over hundreds of micrometers within seconds-to-minutes. Wound detection involves the conversion of an injury-induced homeostatic perturbation, such as cell lysis, an unconstrained epithelial edge, or permeability barrier breakdown, into a chemical or physical signal. The signal is spatially propagated through the tissue to synchronize protective responses of cells near the wound site and at a distance. This review summarizes the triggers and mechanisms of wound detection in animals.

Indexed as

AnimalsCalciumCell DeathChemotaxisEndothelial CellsEpithelial CellsHumansLeukocytesReactive Oxygen SpeciesWound HealingWounds and InjuriesCalciumReactive Oxygen Species

Identifiers

PMID25813429
PMCPMC4475481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.