Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25813373›Full record

ArticleArchives of physical medicine and rehabilitation2015

It takes two: noninvasive brain stimulation combined with neurorehabilitation.

Stephen J Page, David A Cunningham, Ela Plow, Brittani Blazak

4 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03109171 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Accuracy of the Sensory Test Performed Using the Laryngopharyngeal Endoscopic Esthesiometer and Rangefinder in Patients With Suspected Obstructive Sleep Apnoea Hypopnea (OSA): a Prospective Double-blinded, Randomised, Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorFundación Neumologica ColombianaRan2018 to 2026Enrolled117ConditionsSleep Apnea, Obstructive, Larynx, Sensory DisorderArmsLaryngopharyngeal sensory test
NCT04607343 nasuspendednot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Clinical Trial of a Rehabilitation Device Based on Electrical Stimulation for Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnoea (OSA): a Study Protocol

TypeinterventionalSponsorFundación Neumologica ColombianaRan2026 to 2027Enrolled17ConditionsObstructive Sleep ApnoeaArmsRehabilitation device based on electrical stimulation
NCT05226910 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Transcranial Direct Current Combined With Intensive Therapies in Infantile Hemiplegia. Triple-blind Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Castilla-La ManchaRan2021 to 2022Enrolled18ConditionsInfantile HemiplegiaArmstDCS and intensive therapies, Sham and intensive therapies
NCT05350033 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Inhibitory Control in Addictions: a Triple-blinded, Sham-controlled Clinical Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidad de AlmeriaRan2021 to 2022Enrolled200ConditionsSubstance-Related DisordersArmstDCS - tDCS, tDCS - Sham, Sham - tDCS, Sham - Sham
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Stephen J PageSchool of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH; B.R.A.I.N. Laboratory, Columbus, OH. Electronic address: stephen.page@osumc.edu.
David A CunninghamDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; School of Biomedical Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, OH.
Ela PlowDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
Brittani BlazakSchool of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
Cleveland Clinic · USCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine · USThe Ohio State University · USThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · US

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative of ClevelandUL1TR000439 · NCATS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI KONSTAN, MICHAEL W. · 2012 to 2016
$50.0M
Mental Practice in Chronic, Stroke-Induced HemiparesisR01AT004454 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI PAGE, STEPHEN J. · 2009 to 2013
$3.6M
Brain Stimulation- aided Stroke Rehabilitation: Neural Mechanisms of RecoveryK01HD069504 · NICHD · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI PLOW, ELA B · 2011 to 2015
$531k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000439NCCIH NIH HHS R01 AT004454NCCIH NIH HHS R01AT004454-04NICHD NIH HHS 1K01HD069504NICHD NIH HHS K01 HD069504
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of postacute neurorehabilitation is to maximize patient function, ideally by using surviving brain and central nervous system tissue when possible. However, the structures incorporated into neurorehabilitative approaches often differ from this target, which may explain why the efficacy of conventional clinical treatments targeting neurologic impairment varies widely. Noninvasive brain stimulation (eg, transcranial magnetic stimulation [TMS], transcranial direct current stimulation [tDCS]) offers the possibility of directly targeting brain structures to facilitate or inhibit their activity to steer neural plasticity in recovery and measure neuronal output and interactions for evaluating progress. The latest advances as stereotactic navigation and electric field modeling are enabling more precise targeting of patient's residual structures in diagnosis and therapy. Given its promise, this supplement illustrates the wide-ranging significance of TMS and tDCS in neurorehabilitation, including in stroke, pediatrics, traumatic brain injury, focal hand dystonia, neuropathic pain, and spinal cord injury. TMS and tDCS are still not widely used and remain poorly understood in neurorehabilitation. Therefore, the present supplement includes articles that highlight ready clinical application of these technologies, including their comparative diagnostic capabilities relative to neuroimaging, their therapeutic benefit, their optimal delivery, the stratification of likely responders, and the variable benefits associated with their clinical use because of interactions between pathophysiology and the innate reorganization of the patient's brain. Overall, the supplement concludes that whether provided in isolation or in combination, noninvasive brain stimulation and neurorehabilitation are synergistic in the potential to transform clinical practice.

Indexed as

Physical Therapy ModalitiesBrain DiseasesHumansNeuroimagingTranscranial Direct Current StimulationTranscranial Magnetic StimulationElectric stimulationHemiplegiaNeuromodulationRehabilitationStrokeTranscramial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID25813373
PMCPMC4445084
OpenAlexW2035962114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.