Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25813217›Full record

Trial reportClinical drug investigation2015

Safety and pharmacokinetics of single and multiple ascending doses of avibactam alone and in combination with ceftazidime in healthy male volunteers: results of two randomized, placebo-controlled studies.

Henri Merdjan, Manickam Rangaraju, Antoine Tarral

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical drug investigation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Efficacy of Ceftazidime-avibactam in treating Gram-negative infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. PK/PD study of ceftazidime/avibactam in patients with severe intra-abdominal infections treated by continuous veno-venous hemofiltration.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Henri MerdjanPharsight Consulting Services Europe, Regus Business Centre, 37-39 Avenue Ledru Rollin, CS11237, 75570, Paris Cedex 12, France, Henri.Merdjan@certara.com.
Manickam Rangaraju
Antoine Tarral

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveAvibactam is a novel non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor effective against Ambler class A, C and some class D β-lactamases that is currently in clinical development in combination with ceftazidime for the treatment of serious Gram-negative infections. It restores the in vitro activity of a range of β-lactams, including ceftazidime, against extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing pathogens. Two phase I studies assessed the safety and pharmacokinetics of avibactam in healthy subjects when administered alone or with ceftazidime.

methodsThe first study (NXL104-1001) was a placebo-controlled, single-ascending dose study assessing avibactam 50, 100, 250, 500, 1000, 1500 or 2000 mg given as a 30-min intravenous infusion. After a 7-day washout, subjects in the 250 and 500 mg dosing groups received a second avibactam dose with concomitant ceftazidime 1000 or 2000 mg, respectively. The second study (NXL104-1002) was performed in two parts. Part 1 assessed multiple-ascending doses of avibactam. Subjects were randomized to receive avibactam 500, 750 or 1000 mg every 8 h (q8 h) over 5 days, or ceftazidime-avibactam 2000-500 mg q8 h over 10 days. Part 2 assessed bioavailability of avibactam after a single oral dose (500 mg) relative to a single 30-min intravenous infusion (500 mg).

resultsNo serious or severe adverse events were reported in either study. Avibactam exposure generally increased proportionally to dose and there was no trend for accumulation after multiple doses. Almost all avibactam was excreted largely unchanged in the urine within the first 6 h. Concomitant ceftazidime did not affect avibactam's safety and pharmacokinetic profile. Avibactam exposure after oral dosing was very low at 6.2 % of that observed after intravenous infusion.

conclusionAvibactam was generally well tolerated across all dosing regimens, when given alone or with ceftazidime. Avibactam exposure was dose related in both studies, and avibactam pharmacokinetics were linear and not affected by ceftazidime.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdolescentAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsAzabicyclo Compoundsbeta-Lactamase InhibitorsBiological AvailabilityCeftazidimeDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodDrug CombinationsHealthy VolunteersHumansInfusions, IntravenousMaleMiddle AgedAnti-Bacterial Agentsavibactamavibactam, ceftazidime drug combinationAzabicyclo Compoundsbeta-Lactamase InhibitorsCeftazidimeDrug Combinations

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.