ArticleTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2015
Development of a gLCR-based KRAS mutation detection approach and its comparison with other screening methods.
Article in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advances in ligase chain reaction and ligation-based amplifications for genotyping assays: Detection and applications.Mutation research. Reviews in mutation research · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A gapped ligase chain reaction (gLCR)-based technique was developed and tested on clinical formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues from colorectal cancer patients. The technique was designed to detect low-level KRAS codon 12 or 13 mutations or confirming doubtful results gained by less sensitive KRAS screening techniques. The gLCR approach was compared with mutation screening techniques commonly used in routine diagnostics regarding sensitivity and specificity. The herein described monoplex gLCR technique is a useful and powerful tool for detecting low-level KRAS codon 12 and 13 mutations in a vast majority of wild type DNA. The gLCR has the capacity to detect one mutated allele in an excess of at least one million wild type alleles (0.0001 %) and is therefore an ideal technique for confirming doubtful KRAS mutation screening results obtained by other techniques. The variance of the gLCRs signal amplitude was very low and is showing a high reproducibility with constant sensitivity even at higher dilutions. The financial effort and the handling time for this technique are low and comparable to a standard cycle sequencing reaction. Additionally, the gLCR technique is easy extendable for the detection of many other clinical relevant mutation hotspots.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.