Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25813045›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2015

Post-conversion targeted capture of modified cytosines in mammalian and plant genomes.

Qing Li, Masako Suzuki, Jennifer Wendt, Nicole Patterson, Steven R Eichten, Peter J Hermanson, Dawn Green, Jeffrey Jeddeloh, Todd Richmond, Heidi Rosenbaum and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Latest techniques to study DNA methylation.Essays in biochemistry · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Sequencing in High Definition Drives a Changing Worldview of the Epigenome.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2019
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Qing LiDepartment of Plant Biology, University of Minnesota, 1445 Gortner Ave, Saint Paul, MN 55108, USA.
Masako SuzukiCenter for Epigenomics and Division of Computational Genetics, Department of Genetics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1301 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY 10461, USA.
Jennifer WendtRoche-NimbleGen, 500 South Rosa Road, Madison, WI 53711, USA.
Nicole PattersonCenter for Epigenomics and Division of Computational Genetics, Department of Genetics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1301 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY 10461, USA.
Steven R EichtenDepartment of Plant Biology, University of Minnesota, 1445 Gortner Ave, Saint Paul, MN 55108, USA.
Peter J HermansonDepartment of Plant Biology, University of Minnesota, 1445 Gortner Ave, Saint Paul, MN 55108, USA.
Dawn GreenRoche-NimbleGen, 500 South Rosa Road, Madison, WI 53711, USA.
Jeffrey JeddelohRoche-NimbleGen, 500 South Rosa Road, Madison, WI 53711, USA.
Todd RichmondRoche-NimbleGen, 500 South Rosa Road, Madison, WI 53711, USA.
Heidi RosenbaumRoche-NimbleGen, 500 South Rosa Road, Madison, WI 53711, USA.
Daniel BurgessRoche-NimbleGen, 500 South Rosa Road, Madison, WI 53711, USA daniel.burgess@roche.com.
Nathan M SpringerDepartment of Plant Biology, University of Minnesota, 1445 Gortner Ave, Saint Paul, MN 55108, USA springer@umn.edu.
John M GreallyCenter for Epigenomics and Division of Computational Genetics, Department of Genetics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1301 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY 10461, USA john.greally@einstein.yu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a capture-based approach for bisulfite-converted DNA that allows interrogation of pre-defined genomic locations, allowing quantitative and qualitative assessments of 5-methylcytosine (5mC) and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) at CG dinucleotides and in non-CG contexts (CHG, CHH) in mammalian and plant genomes. We show the technique works robustly and reproducibly using as little as 500 ng of starting DNA, with results correlating well with whole genome bisulfite sequencing data, and demonstrate that human DNA can be tested in samples contaminated with microbial DNA. This targeting approach will allow cell type-specific designs to maximize the value of 5mC and 5hmC sequencing.

Indexed as

Genome, Plant5-MethylcytosineAllelesAnimalsCell LineCytosineDNA MethylationGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMicePolymorphism, Single NucleotideSequence Analysis, DNASulfites5-hydroxymethylcytosine5-MethylcytosineCytosinehydrogen sulfiteSulfites

Identifiers

PMID25813045
PMCPMC4499119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.