Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25811873›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Genome-based identification of active prophage regions by next generation sequencing in Bacillus licheniformis DSM13.

Robert Hertel, David Pintor Rodríguez, Jacqueline Hollensteiner, Sascha Dietrich, Andreas Leimbach, Michael Hoppert, Heiko Liesegang, Sonja Volland

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Novel insights into phage biology of the pathogenFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Chronic Release of Tailless Phage Particles from Lactococcus lactis.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Closely RelatedViruses · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Robert HertelGeorg-August University Göttingen, Institute of Microbiology and Genetics, Department of Genomic and Applied Microbiology, Göttingen, Germany.
David Pintor RodríguezGeorg-August University Göttingen, Institute of Microbiology and Genetics, Department of Genomic and Applied Microbiology, Göttingen, Germany.
Jacqueline HollensteinerGeorg-August University Göttingen, Institute of Microbiology and Genetics, Department of Genomic and Applied Microbiology, Göttingen, Germany.
Sascha DietrichGeorg-August University Göttingen, Institute of Microbiology and Genetics, Department of Genomic and Applied Microbiology, Göttingen, Germany.
Andreas LeimbachGeorg-August University Göttingen, Institute of Microbiology and Genetics, Department of Genomic and Applied Microbiology, Göttingen, Germany.
Michael HoppertGeorg-August University Göttingen, Institute of Microbiology and Genetics, Department of Genomic and Applied Microbiology, Göttingen, Germany.
Heiko LiesegangGeorg-August University Göttingen, Institute of Microbiology and Genetics, Department of Genomic and Applied Microbiology, Göttingen, Germany.
Sonja VollandGeorg-August University Göttingen, Institute of Microbiology and Genetics, Department of Genomic and Applied Microbiology, Göttingen, Germany.
University of Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prophages are viruses, which have integrated their genomes into the genome of a bacterial host. The status of the prophage genome can vary from fully intact with the potential to form infective particles to a remnant state where only a few phage genes persist. Prophages have impact on the properties of their host and are therefore of great interest for genomic research and strain design. Here we present a genome- and next generation sequencing (NGS)-based approach for identification and activity evaluation of prophage regions. Seven prophage or prophage-like regions were identified in the genome of Bacillus licheniformis DSM13. Six of these regions show similarity to members of the Siphoviridae phage family. The remaining region encodes the B. licheniformis orthologue of the PBSX prophage from Bacillus subtilis. Analysis of isolated phage particles (induced by mitomycin C) from the wild-type strain and prophage deletion mutant strains revealed activity of the prophage regions BLi_Pp2 (PBSX-like), BLi_Pp3 and BLi_Pp6. In contrast to BLi_Pp2 and BLi_Pp3, neither phage DNA nor phage particles of BLi_Pp6 could be visualized. However, the ability of prophage BLi_Pp6 to generate particles could be confirmed by sequencing of particle-protected DNA mapping to prophage locus BLi_Pp6. The introduced NGS-based approach allows the investigation of prophage regions and their ability to form particles. Our results show that this approach increases the sensitivity of prophage activity analysis and can complement more conventional approaches such as transmission electron microscopy (TEM).

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingBacillusBacteriophagesGene DeletionMutationProviruses

Identifiers

PMID25811873
PMCPMC4374763
OpenAlexW2089221788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.