Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25811769›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2015

A systematic review of community readiness tool applications: implications for reporting.

Iordan Kostadinov, Mark Daniel, Linda Stanley, Agustina Gancia, Margaret Cargo

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Schools' Readiness for Child Sexual Abuse Prevention Education: an Overview of Theoretical Models.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Using the Community Readiness Model to Assess American Indian Communities Readiness to Address Cancer Prevention and Control Programs.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Iordan KostadinovSchool of Population Health, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia. Iordan.Kostadinov@mymail.unisa.edu.au.
Mark DanielSchool of Population Health, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia. Mark.Daniel@unisa.edu.au.
Linda StanleyCollege of Natural Sciences, Tri-Ethnic Center, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA. Linda.Stanley@colostate.edu.
Agustina GanciaSchool of Population Health, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia. Agustina.Gancia@mymail.unisa.edu.au.
Margaret CargoSchool of Population Health, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia. Margaret.Cargo@unisa.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA systematic review characterised and synthesised applications of the Community Readiness Tool (CRT) and synthesised quantitative results for readiness applications at multiple time points.

methodsEleven databases in OvidSP and EBSCHOhost were searched to retrieve CRT applications. Information from primary studies was extracted independently by two researchers.

resultsForty applications of the CRT met inclusion criteria focussing on 14 different health and social issues. The community of interest was most often defined solely on the basis of its geographical location (52.5%). Most studies used the CRT to plan (85%) and/or evaluate programs (40%). The CRT protocol was modified in 40% of studies. Six applications evaluated readiness at multiple time points, however limited reporting in primary studies precluded any synthesis of results. Applications identified methodological rigour, contextual information and community engagement as strengths, and time and resource costs as limitations.

conclusionsThe CRT is well suited for planning and evaluating complex community health interventions given its flexibility to accommodate diverse definitions of community and issues. CRT applications would benefit from improved reporting; reporting recommendations for use of the CRT are outlined.

Indexed as

Community-Based Participatory ResearchCommunity Health PlanningHealth PromotionHumansPublic Health

Identifiers

PMID25811769
PMCPMC4410196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.