Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25811457›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Introduction of soft X-ray spectromicroscopy as an advanced technique for plant biopolymers research.

Chithra Karunakaran, Colleen R Christensen, Cedric Gaillard, Rachid Lahlali, Lisa M Blair, Vijayan Perumal, Shea S Miller, Adam P Hitchcock

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Imaging cell morphology and physiology using X-rays.Biochemical Society transactions · 2019
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Chithra KarunakaranCanadian Light Source Inc., 44 Innovation Boulevard, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Colleen R ChristensenIndustrial Research Assistance Program-National Research Council Canada, 110 Gymnasium Place, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Cedric GaillardINRA-Biopolymers, Interactions, Assemblies Unit (BIA), Nantes, France.
Rachid LahlaliCanadian Light Source Inc., 44 Innovation Boulevard, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Lisa M BlairCanadian Light Source Inc., 44 Innovation Boulevard, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada; Canadian Food Inspection Agency, 116 Veterinary Road, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Vijayan PerumalCanadian Light Source Inc., 44 Innovation Boulevard, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Shea S MillerAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Eastern Cereal and Oilseed Research Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Adam P HitchcockBrockhouse Institute for Materials Research, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
University of Saskatchewan · CABiopolymères Interactions Assemblages · FRBrockhouse Institute for Materials Research · CACanadian Food Inspection Agency · CANational Research Council Canada · CAOttawa Research and Development Centre

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soft X-ray absorption spectroscopy coupled with nano-scale microscopy has been widely used in material science, environmental science, and physical sciences. In this work, the advantages of soft X-ray absorption spectromicroscopy for plant biopolymer research were demonstrated by determining the chemical sensitivity of the technique to identify common plant biopolymers and to map the distributions of biopolymers in plant samples. The chemical sensitivity of soft X-ray spectroscopy to study biopolymers was determined by recording the spectra of common plant biopolymers using soft X-ray and Fourier Transform mid Infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy techniques. The soft X-ray spectra of lignin, cellulose, and polygalacturonic acid have distinct spectral features. However, there were no distinct differences between cellulose and hemicellulose spectra. Mid infrared spectra of all biopolymers were unique and there were differences between the spectra of water soluble and insoluble xylans. The advantage of nano-scale spatial resolution exploited using soft X-ray spectromicroscopy for plant biopolymer research was demonstrated by mapping plant cell wall biopolymers in a lentil stem section and compared with the FT-IR spectromicroscopy data from the same sample. The soft X-ray spectromicroscopy enables mapping of biopolymers at the sub-cellular (~30 nm) resolution whereas, the limited spatial resolution in the micron scale range in the FT-IR spectromicroscopy made it difficult to identify the localized distribution of biopolymers. The advantages and limitations of soft X-ray and FT-IR spectromicroscopy techniques for biopolymer research are also discussed.

Indexed as

X-Ray Absorption SpectroscopyBiopolymersLens PlantPlantsPlant StemsSpectroscopy, Fourier Transform InfraredBiopolymers

Identifiers

PMID25811457
PMCPMC4374829
OpenAlexW2023342576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.