Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25811358›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Gender difference in ventricular response to aortic stenosis: insight from cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Joo Myung Lee, Sung-Ji Park, Seung-Pyo Lee, Eunah Park, Sung-A Chang, Hyung-Kwan Kim, Whal Lee, Yong-Jin Kim, Sang-Chol Lee, Seung Woo Park and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Left ventricular changes in moderate aortic stenosis in women compared to men.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Understanding Aortic Stenosis and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Women.Structural heart : the journal of the Heart Team · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Valvular Heart Disease in Women, Differential Remodeling, and Response to New Therapies.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Joo Myung LeeCardiovascular Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Department of Internal Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Sung-Ji ParkCardiovascular Imaging Center, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Seung-Pyo LeeCardiovascular Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Department of Internal Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Eunah ParkDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Sung-A ChangCardiovascular Imaging Center, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Hyung-Kwan KimCardiovascular Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Department of Internal Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Whal LeeDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Yong-Jin KimCardiovascular Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Department of Internal Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Sang-Chol LeeCardiovascular Imaging Center, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Seung Woo ParkCardiovascular Imaging Center, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Dae-Won SohnCardiovascular Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Department of Internal Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Yeon Hyeon ChoeCardiovascular Imaging Center, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Samsung Medical Center · KRSeoul National University Hospital · KRSungkyunkwan University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and remodeling is associated with cardiac mortality and morbidity, little is known about the impact of gender on the ventricular response in aortic stenosis (AS) patients. This study aimed to analyze the differential effect of gender on ventricular remodeling in moderate to severe AS patients. METHODS AND

resultsA total of 118 consecutive patients (67±9 years; 63 males) with moderate or severe AS (severe 81.4%) underwent transthoracic echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) within a 1-month period in this two-center prospective registry. The pattern of LV remodeling was assessed using the LV mass index (LVMI) and LV remodeling index (LVRI; LV mass/LV end-diastolic volume) by CMR. Although there were no differences in AS severity parameters nor baseline characteristics between genders, males showed a significantly higher LVMI (102.6±29.1 g/m2 vs. 86.1±29.2 g/m2, p=0.003) and LVRI (1.1±0.2 vs. 1.0±0.3, p=0.018), regardless of AS severity. The LVMI was significantly associated with aortic valve area (AVA) index and valvuloarterial impedance in females, whereas it was not in males, resulting in significant interaction between genders (PInteraction=0.007/0.014 for AVA index/valvuloarterial impedance, respectively). Similarly, the LVRI also showed a significantly different association between male and female subjects with the change in AS severity parameters (PInteraction=0.033/<0.001/0.029 for AVA index/transaortic mean pressure gradient/valvuloarterial impedance, respectively).

conclusionMales are associated with greater degree of LVH and higher LVRI compared to females at moderate to severe AS. However, females showed a more exaggerated LV remodeling response, with increased severity of AS and hemodynamic loads, than males.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance AngiographyAgedAortic Valve StenosisEchocardiographyFemaleHeart VentriclesHemodynamicsHumansHypertrophy, Left VentricularMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsSeverity of Illness IndexSex FactorsVentricular Remodeling

Identifiers

PMID25811358
PMCPMC4374835
OpenAlexW2048224508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.