Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25811034›Full record

ArticleJournal of immunology research2015

Impact of kefir derived Lactobacillus kefiri on the mucosal immune response and gut microbiota.

P Carasi, S M Racedo, C Jacquot, D E Romanin, M A Serradell, M C Urdaci

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immunology research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 134 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Kefir revisited: Insights from the North Caucasus.World journal of experimental medicine · 2025
    Review
  7. BiombalanceAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  13. Functional evaluation of synbiotic combination ofCurrent research in food science · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Effect ofNutrients · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

P CarasiUniversité de Bordeaux, UMR 5248, Laboratoire de Microbiologie et Biochimie Appliquée (LBMA), Bordeaux Sciences Agro, 1 Cours du General de Gaulle, 33175 Gradignan, France ; Cátedra de Microbiología, Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata (UNLP), 47 y 115 s/n, 1900 La Plata, Argentina.
S M RacedoUniversité de Bordeaux, UMR 5248, Laboratoire de Microbiologie et Biochimie Appliquée (LBMA), Bordeaux Sciences Agro, 1 Cours du General de Gaulle, 33175 Gradignan, France.
C JacquotUniversité de Bordeaux, UMR 5248, Laboratoire de Microbiologie et Biochimie Appliquée (LBMA), Bordeaux Sciences Agro, 1 Cours du General de Gaulle, 33175 Gradignan, France.
D E RomaninInstituto de Estudios Inmunológicos y Fisiopatológicos (IIFP), CCT La Plata-CONICET, UNLP, 47 y 115 s/n, 1900 La Plata, Argentina.
M A SerradellCátedra de Microbiología, Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata (UNLP), 47 y 115 s/n, 1900 La Plata, Argentina.
M C UrdaciUniversité de Bordeaux, UMR 5248, Laboratoire de Microbiologie et Biochimie Appliquée (LBMA), Bordeaux Sciences Agro, 1 Cours du General de Gaulle, 33175 Gradignan, France.
Université de Bordeaux · FRConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARUniversidad Nacional de La Plata · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evaluation of the impact of probiotics on host health could help to understand how they can be used in the prevention of diseases. On the basis of our previous studies and in vitro assays on PBMC and Caco-2 ccl20:luc reporter system presented in this work, the strain Lactobacillus kefiri CIDCA 8348 was selected and administrated to healthy Swiss mice daily for 21 days. The probiotic treatment increased IgA in feces and reduced expression of proinflammatory mediators in Peyer Patches and mesenteric lymph nodes, where it also increased IL-10. In ileum IL-10, CXCL-1 and mucin 6 genes were upregulated; meanwhile in colon mucin 4 was induced whereas IFN-γ, GM-CSF, and IL-1β genes were downregulated. Moreover, ileum and colon explants showed the anti-inflammatory effect of L. kefiri since the LPS-induced increment of IL-6 and GM-CSF levels in control mice was significantly attenuated in L. kefiri treated mice. Regarding fecal microbiota, DGGE profiles allowed differentiation of experimental groups in two separated clusters. Quantitative PCR analysis of different bacterial groups revealed only significant changes in Lactobacillus population. In conclusion, L. kefiri is a good candidate to be used in gut inflammatory disorders.

Indexed as

Immunity, MucosalAnimalsCell LineCultured Milk ProductsCytokinesFecesGastrointestinal MicrobiomeGene ExpressionGene Expression RegulationGenes, ReporterHumansImmunoglobulin AIntestinal MucosaLactobacillusLeukocytes, MononuclearLymphocyte SubsetsCytokinesImmunoglobulin A

Identifiers

PMID25811034
PMCPMC4355334
OpenAlexW2068418325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.