ReviewMolecular cytogenetics2015
History and evolution of cytogenetics.
Review in Molecular cytogenetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Cytogenetics of Neotropical fishes: Patterns, advances and prospects after five decades of research.Genetics and molecular biology · 2026Article
- Review
- Review
- The New Era of Cancer Cytogenetics and Cytogenomics.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Tracking Karyotype Changes in Treatment-Induced Drug-Resistant Evolution.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Aneuploidy in human cancer: new tools and perspectives.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2023Review
- Comparative studies of X chromosomes in Cervidae family.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Origins of human genetics. A personal perspective.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2021Review
- Review
- Let Chromosomes Speak: The Cytogenetics Project at the Atomic Bomb Casualty Commission (ABCC).Journal of the history of biology · 2021Article
- CytoConverter: a web-based tool to convert karyotypes to genomic coordinates.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- Review
- From Human Cytogenetics to Human Chromosomics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
- Somatic Mutagenesis in Mammals and Its Implications for Human Disease and Aging.Annual review of genetics · 2018Review
- A Postgenomic Perspective on Molecular Cytogenetics.Current genomics · 2018Article
- Article
- X Chromosome Evolution in Cetartiodactyla.Genes · 2017Article
- Genome instability: a conserved mechanism of ageing?Essays in biochemistry · 2017Review
- A high-fidelity method for genomic sequencing of single somatic cells reveals a very high mutational burden.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The events that have led to the development of cytogenetics as a specialty within the life sciences are described, with special attention to the early history of human cytogenetics. Improvements in the resolution of chromosome analysis has followed closely the introduction of innovative technology. The review provides a brief account of the structure of somatic and meiotic chromosomes, stressing the high conservation of structure in plants and animals, with emphasis on aspects that require further research. The future of molecular cytogenetics is likely to depend on a better knowledge of chromosome structure and function.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.