ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2015
DISSCO: direct imputation of summary statistics allowing covariates.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- The goldmine of GWAS summary statistics: a systematic review of methods and tools.BioData mining · 2024Article
- A powerful subset-based method identifies gene set associations and improves interpretation in UK Biobank.American journal of human genetics · 2021Article
- Understanding HLA associations from SNP summary association statistics.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Proper joint analysis of summary association statistics requires the adjustment of heterogeneity in SNP coverage pattern.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2018Article
- Comparison of novel and existing methods for detecting differentially methylated regions.BMC genetics · 2018Article
- Accurate and adaptive imputation of summary statistics in mixed-ethnicity cohorts.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2018Article
- PolyGEE: a generalized estimating equation approach to the efficient and robust estimation of polygenic effects in large-scale association studies.Biostatistics (Oxford, England) · 2018Article
- Analysis of genetic and nongenetic factors influencing triglycerides-lowering drug effects based on paired observations.BMC proceedings · 2018Article
- Prospects of Fine-Mapping Trait-Associated Genomic Regions by Using Summary Statistics from Genome-wide Association Studies.American journal of human genetics · 2017Article
- Dissecting the genetics of complex traits using summary association statistics.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2017Review
- Transethnic Genetic-Correlation Estimates from Summary Statistics.American journal of human genetics · 2016Article
- JEPEGMIX: gene-level joint analysis of functional SNPs in cosmopolitan cohorts.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2016Article
- Fast and Rigorous Computation of Gene and Pathway Scores from SNP-Based Summary Statistics.PLoS computational biology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundImputation of individual level genotypes at untyped markers using an external reference panel of genotyped or sequenced individuals has become standard practice in genetic association studies. Direct imputation of summary statistics can also be valuable, for example in meta-analyses where individual level genotype data are not available. Two methods (DIST and ImpG-Summary/LD), that assume a multivariate Gaussian distribution for the association summary statistics, have been proposed for imputing association summary statistics. However, both methods assume that the correlations between association summary statistics are the same as the correlations between the corresponding genotypes. This assumption can be violated in the presence of confounding covariates.
methodsWe analytically show that in the absence of covariates, correlation among association summary statistics is indeed the same as that among the corresponding genotypes, thus serving as a theoretical justification for the recently proposed methods. We continue to prove that in the presence of covariates, correlation among association summary statistics becomes the partial correlation of the corresponding genotypes controlling for covariates. We therefore develop direct imputation of summary statistics allowing covariates (DISSCO).
resultsWe consider two real-life scenarios where the correlation and partial correlation likely make practical difference: (i) association studies in admixed populations; (ii) association studies in presence of other confounding covariate(s). Application of DISSCO to real datasets under both scenarios shows at least comparable, if not better, performance compared with existing correlation-based methods, particularly for lower frequency variants. For example, DISSCO can reduce the absolute deviation from the truth by 3.9-15.2% for variants with minor allele frequency <5%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.