Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25810398›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2015

Impact of natural gas extraction on PAH levels in ambient air.

L Blair Paulik, Carey E Donald, Brian W Smith, Lane G Tidwell, Kevin A Hobbie, Laurel Kincl, Erin N Haynes, Kim A Anderson

RetractedOpen access · greenAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science & technology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Extensive review of shale gas environmental impacts from scientific literature (2010-2015).Environmental science and pollution research international · 2017
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Transport stability of pesticides and PAHs sequestered in polyethylene passive sampling devices.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2016
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

L Blair Paulik†Department of Environmental and Molecular Toxicology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331, United States.
Carey E Donald†Department of Environmental and Molecular Toxicology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331, United States.
Brian W Smith†Department of Environmental and Molecular Toxicology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331, United States.
Lane G Tidwell†Department of Environmental and Molecular Toxicology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331, United States.
Kevin A Hobbie†Department of Environmental and Molecular Toxicology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331, United States.
Laurel Kincl‡College of Public Health and Human Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331, United States.
Erin N Haynes§Department of Environmental Health, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45267, United States.
Kim A Anderson†Department of Environmental and Molecular Toxicology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331, United States.
Oregon State University · USUniversity of Cincinnati · US

Funding

Research Experience and Training Coordination CoreP42ES016465 · NIEHS · OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Robyn L Tanguay · 2009 to 2026
$52.5M
REPRODUCTIVE AND DEVELOPMENTAL TOXICOLOGY RESEARCHP30ES006096 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI YADAV, JAGJIT S · 1992 to 2022
$35.4M
Reducing Susceptibility to Environmental Stress Throughout the Life SpanP30ES000210 · NIEHS · OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BECKMAN, JOSEPH S · 1985 to 2015
$21.4M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES000210NIEHS NIH HHS P30-ES000210NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES006096NIEHS NIH HHS P30-ES06096NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES016465
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural gas extraction, often referred to as "fracking," has increased rapidly in the U.S. in recent years. To address potential health impacts, passive air samplers were deployed in a rural community heavily affected by the natural gas boom. Samplers were analyzed for 62 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Results were grouped based on distance from each sampler to the nearest active well. PAH levels were highest when samplers were closest to active wells. Additionally, PAH levels closest to natural gas activity were an order of magnitude higher than levels previously reported in rural areas. Sourcing ratios indicate that PAHs were predominantly petrogenic, suggesting that elevated PAH levels were influenced by direct releases from the earth. Quantitative human health risk assessment estimated the excess lifetime cancer risks associated with exposure to the measured PAHs. Closest to active wells, the risk estimated for maximum residential exposure was 2.9 in 10 000, which is above the U.S. EPA's acceptable risk level. Overall, risk estimates decreased 30% when comparing results from samplers closest to active wells to those farthest. This work suggests that natural gas extraction may be contributing significantly to PAHs in air, at levels that are relevant to human health.

Indexed as

Natural GasAir PollutantsEnvironmentEnvironmental MonitoringHumansOhioOil and Gas IndustryPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsPublic HealthRisk AssessmentUnited StatesAir PollutantsNatural GasPolycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons

Identifiers

PMID25810398
PMCPMC4415607
OpenAlexW2010855046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.