Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25810268›Full record

ArticleMedical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making2015

"I don't know" my cancer risk: exploring deficits in cancer knowledge and information-seeking skills to explain an often-overlooked participant response.

Jennifer L Hay, Heather Orom, Marc T Kiviniemi, Erika A Waters

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. How Information-Seeking Reduces Cancer Fatalism: A Comparison of the Mediating Role of Risk Perception in Young and Older Adults.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Dismissing "Don't Know" Responses to Perceived Risk Survey Items Threatens the Validity of Theoretical and Empirical Behavior-Change Research.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. What Drives Preventive Health Behavior During a Global Pandemic? Emotion and Worry.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Measuring Cigarette Smoking Risk Perceptions.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Using NCI-Designated Cancer Center Catchment-Area Data to Understand an Ignored but High-Need Constituent: People Uncertain or Avoidant about Their Cancer Risk.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2019
    Article
  16. Specifying Future Behavior When Assessing Risk Perceptions: Implications for Measurement and Theory.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Item Development and Performance of Tobacco Product and Regulation Perception Items for the Health Information National Trends Survey.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Using the Short Graph Literacy Scale to Predict Precursors of Health Behavior Change.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jennifer L HayDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA (JLH)
Heather OromDepartment of Community Health & Health Behavior, School of Public Health and Health Professions, University at Buffalo, SUNY, New York, NY, USA (HO, MTK)
Marc T KiviniemiDepartment of Community Health & Health Behavior, School of Public Health and Health Professions, University at Buffalo, SUNY, New York, NY, USA (HO, MTK)
Erika A WatersDepartment of Surgery, Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA (EAW).

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Elisa de Stanchina · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Affect and Decision-Making for Cancer-Related BehaviorsK07CA106225 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN · PI KIVINIEMI, MARC T · 2006 to 2010
$534k
Measuring real time decision-making about UVR ProtectionR21CA137532 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI HAY, JENNIFER L · 2009 to 2010
$459k
Cancer Risks Beliefs & ScreeningR21CA133376 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI HAY, JENNIFER L · 2009 to 2010
$457k
DONT KNOW RESPONSES TO PERCEIVED RISK ITEMS: IMPLICATION FOR HEALTH BEHAVIORR03CA177775 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI WATERS, ERIKA A · 2014 to 2015
$186k
NCI NIH HHS CA106225NCI NIH HHS CA133376NCI NIH HHS CA137532NCI NIH HHS CA177775NCI NIH HHS K07 CA106225NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R03 CA177775NCI NIH HHS R21 CA133376NCI NIH HHS R21 CA137532
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPerceived risk is a central theoretical construct in health behavior research. Participants' "don't know" responses to perceived-risk items (DKPR) are usually excluded from analyses. Yet those who provide such responses may have unique cancer information needs.

objectiveThe hypotheses that DKPR responding may be due to cancer knowledge deficits or behavioral, skill, and attitudinal antecedents to knowledge deficits (information seeking, numeracy, and self-efficacy, respectively) were explored.

methodsData from the 2005 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS; N = 1789), a US population-based survey, and an urban, minority, primary care clinic survey (N = 590) were analyzed. Multivariable logistic regressions were conducted to examine knowledge deficit explanations for responding DKPR to colon cancer risk perception questions (adjusting for demographics and family colorectal cancer history). MEASURES: Comparative (HINTS) and absolute verbal perceived risk of colon cancer (HINTS, clinic survey), knowledge of colon cancer risks and screening, cancer/health information-seeking behavior and self-efficacy (HINTS), and numeracy (clinic survey).

resultsGreater knowledge of colon cancer prevention and screening, cancer and health information seeking, and numeracy were each associated with lower odds of providing a DKPR response. LIMITATIONS: The study was cross-sectional, which limits the ability to infer causal direction. The use of existing data sets limited our variable choices. Other plausible hypotheses may also explain DKPR responding.

conclusionsPeople who report that they don't know their colon cancer risk may have low cancer knowledge and reduced knowledge acquisition behaviors and skills. Health behavior research could benefit from including data concerning DKPR responses to risk perception questions, because individuals who respond in this way may require interventions to address potential cancer risk knowledge deficits.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeInformation Seeking BehaviorAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overColonic NeoplasmsFemaleHealth SurveysHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsSelf Efficacycolorectal cancer knowledgeinformation seekingitem responsemeasurementrisk perceptions

Identifiers

PMID25810268
PMCPMC4424091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.